COX v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 401

cheryl

I started this.
Staff member
COX v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC 401 - Findlaw

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Paul COX, Appellant v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.; International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 401

No. 17-2989
Decided: October 10, 2018

Before: HARDIMAN, KRAUSE, and BIBAS, Circuit JudgesJack M. Bernard, Esq., Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff-Appellant Timothy M. McCarthy, Esq., Gary M. Tocci, Esq., Jackson Lewis, Philadelphia, PA, Collin O. Udell, Esq., Jackson Lewis, Hartford, CT, for Defendant-Appellee United Parcel Service Inc Lars H. Anderson, Esq., Hourigan Kluger & Quinn, Kingston, PA, for Defendant-Appellee International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 401
OPINION *

If a party gets four extensions of his discovery deadlines and blows through them all without justification, he may well not get a fifth chance. The District Court here was admirably patient with Paul Cox, but that patience is finite. It repeatedly warned him that it would dismiss his case unless he complied. When Cox flouted the Court’s deadline yet again, the Court was entirely justified in following through and dismissing the case with prejudice.
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
He was a UPS Driver!
(The) Article said he was (a) mechanic
"Paul Cox was a mechanic for UPS "
Reading is FUNdamental
There were multi-syllable words in the link. You can't expect someone who was in corporate to be able to read that. Plus @Old Man Jingles went to diploma mill school Georgia Tech
I know ... just wanted to stir the pot a little.


View attachment 220154
 
Top