What'dyabringmetoday???
Well-Known Member
Nope- UPS employee. Get rid of you guys and more work for us. Nothing personal Sonny...You sound like a FedEx board member.![]()
Nope- UPS employee. Get rid of you guys and more work for us. Nothing personal Sonny...You sound like a FedEx board member.![]()
I think youāre mistaken. Itās happening almost daily.I could see them implementing a productivity pay out or some sort of profit sharing. I donāt think they believe in the amount of contractors failing or walking. Freds a wait n see kinda leader and right now heās seeing a lot of talk.
You aināt alone brother.I'd like to see Fed-Ex go out of business.
Thatās so true! Grounds starting to get a small taste of it. Iād switch to s brown uniform and drive that tractor trailer.You aināt alone brother.
Theyāve been far too greedy and way over controlling.
Wouldnāt take even close to 90%. Several large contractors in cities can back up hubs for an entire peak.Good. That is exactly where you start by doing only the required minimum. If there is a complete rejection of K or at the very minimum a 90% rejection then Fat's will know that you mean business.
How high does that number get before employee model looks better? At least a employee model gets them the control back they love.Wouldnāt take even close to 90%. Several large contractors in cities can back up hubs for an entire peak.
Some might take the ramp up money and pocket it and not hire anyone at all. Supposedly X can get that money back if a contractor āfailsā.
Still interested to see how many just take the ERC money and exit come November. If X continues on the course theyāve been on, that could well be a significant number.
The greed of others has never aroused anger in me. Because greed is sensible, understandable, and relatable.Theyāve been far too greedy and way over controlling.
The little ones will no doubt step in and take as much of it as they can if the premiums are high enough. Trouble is and I'm sure you know that the carrot doesn't dangle on the stick for long until it's pulled back.Wouldnāt take even close to 90%. Several large contractors in cities can back up hubs for an entire peak.
Some might take the ramp up money and pocket it and not hire anyone at all. Supposedly X can get that money back if a contractor āfailsā.
Still interested to see how many just take the ERC money and exit come November. If X continues on the course theyāve been on, that could well be a significant number.
By the sounds of things you must have been a graduate of the Gordon ( "greed is good") Gekko School of Ruthless Wealth Accumulation.The greed of others has never aroused anger in me. Because greed is sensible, understandable, and relatable.
It's the control-freaks, the superiority complexes, the passive-aggressive types, and an endless stream of idle threats I simply cannot abide.
There is so much disgust and distrust of the company these days that the small ones will hold out as well. Call it silent shadenfreude.The little ones will no doubt step in and take as much of it as they can if the premiums are high enough. Trouble is and I'm sure you know that the carrot doesn't dangle on the stick for long until it's pulled back.
I donāt think it ever does. The costs of such a model (vehicles, employee wages/benefits) and the control the would have would suddenly be āon the booksā. Stockholders would be mortified.How high does that number get before employee model looks better? At least a employee model gets them the control back they love.
Absolutely not. Sadly, I have a conscience.By the sounds of things you must have been a graduate of the Gordon ( "greed is good") Gekko School of Ruthless Wealth Accumulation.
It would be far cheaper to just make contractors profitable again. That would be easy to do. They are choosing not to.How high does that number get before employee model looks better? At least a employee model gets them the control back they love.
How does ups do it? Iād say Productivity!!I donāt think it ever does. The costs of such a model (vehicles, employee wages/benefits) and the control the would have would suddenly be āon the booksā. Stockholders would be mortified.
Better bet those stops per on road hour up if you want to compete with upsHow does ups do it? Iād say Productivity!!
It would be far cheaper to just make contractors profitable again. That would be easy to do. They
Density is a beautiful thing in the delivery businessBetter bet those stops per on road hour up if you want to compete with ups
Welcome to FedEx. This is what exactly has happened to Express over the last 20 years. Express built the brand and the Frontline workers did get to share in that success for quite a while. That is until Federal Express became FedEx.It would be far cheaper to just make contractors profitable again. That would be easy to do. They are choosing not to.
View attachment 395925
UPS already owns their trucks.How does ups do it? Iād say Productivity!!
Would likely require a billion or more dollars upfront, plus millions more in recurring expenses annually, and it would take forever and a day to recoup the upfront costs. It would then take another forever and two days before you might gain any meaningful financial benefit from the merger.Fedxeās only option to succeed in the future is merge and have everyone employees. The climate has changed. It will be painful at first, but well worth it after complete. No other way