thats not true either because some things we cant controlyou have what you allow
but i agree we could allow much better.
thats not true either because some things we cant controlyou have what you allow
you're desperately clinging to your numbers to suit your debbie downer narrative.top 10% own 93% of all stocks in america
bottom 50% own 1%
its because they have no money to invest in it.
the truth hurts. it doesnt have to, but it does quite oftenyou're desperately clinging to your numbers to suit your debbie downer narrative.
top 1% have 53x more stock than the bottom 50%you're desperately clinging to your numbers to suit your debbie downer narrative.
I'm still waiting for your truth.the truth hurts. it doesnt have to, but it does quite often
"Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who said, “The moment we begin to fear the opinions of others and hesitate to tell the truth that is in us, and from motives of policy are silent when we should speak, the divine floods of light and life no longer flow into our souls"I'm still waiting for your truth.
Occupy has nothing to do with Christianity."Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who said, “The moment we begin to fear the opinions of others and hesitate to tell the truth that is in us, and from motives of policy are silent when we should speak, the divine floods of light and life no longer flow into our souls"
![]()
Where Were You When They Crucified My Lord? - Truthdig
The Occupy movement is the force that will revitalize traditional Christianity in the United States or signal its moral, social and political irrelevance.www.truthdig.com
i dont think you would know anyways.Occupy has nothing to do with Christianity.
Try harder next time.
what did elizabeth say about ignoring the complete truth to make a narrow argument?"Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who said, “The moment we begin to fear the opinions of others and hesitate to tell the truth that is in us, and from motives of policy are silent when we should speak, the divine floods of light and life no longer flow into our souls"
![]()
Where Were You When They Crucified My Lord? - Truthdig
The Occupy movement is the force that will revitalize traditional Christianity in the United States or signal its moral, social and political irrelevance.www.truthdig.com
i dont think
another article for youwhat did elizabeth say about ignoring the complete truth to make a narrow argument?
so were ok with human slavery and the high rate of murder and theft at the lower levels as long we focus this discussion on stock market ownership only?another article for you
![]()
How Many Americans Own Stock? More Than You Think | The Motley Fool
How many Americans own stock? 62% of American adults, or around 158 million people, own stock. But there's more to the story.www.fool.com
from a website called FOOL hahah
were talking about what reagan said and how IF what he said was related to stock market ownership then its a failure on that level too.so were ok with human slavery and the high rate of murder and theft at the lower levels as long we focus this discussion on stock market ownership only?
what did reagan say about human slavery, murder and theft in the streets?were talking about what reagan said and how IF what he said was related to stock market ownership then its a failure on that level too.
10% owning so much stock because they are business owners who receive the stock when they incorporate their business. Up to them to make business succeed so that they can list stock on an exchange which allows others to buy stock from them directly in an IPO(Initial Public Offering). That stock is then traded on the exchange.they cant.
and even if they could that still wouldnt really change the fact about 10% owning 90% of stock because that 10% gets so much more money.
Clinton may have signed it into law in the United States but the agreement between Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. was signed by the presidents and prime minister of the three countries in 1992. And Clinton signed a bill passed by Congress that was controlled by the Democrats at the time.it was clinton. he is the one blamed.
View attachment 518989
maybe this is too right wing for right wingers?
View attachment 518990
im just quoting the articles which align with what ive heard from economists.10% owning so much stock because they are business owners who receive the stock when they incorporate their business. Up to them to make business succeed so that they can list stock on an exchange which allows others to buy stock from them directly in an IPO(Initial Public Offering). That stock is then traded on the exchange.
You seem to have the idea that wealthy.people have bought.up most of the stock for themselves. Business owners who've incorporated and are listed on an exchange keep enough of their stock to be the controlling owner in the company. So again, you've demonstrated a lack of understanding of how the system works.
i see that too.Clinton may have signed it into law in the United States but the agreement between Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. was signed by the presidents and prime minister of the three countries in 1992. And Clinton signed a bill passed by Congress that was controlled by the Democrats at the time.
Business ownership is from people taking their savings and starting a small business and growing it. Along the way as they grow they create jobs which allows their employees to pay their bills and have a life. It's not intrinsically evil to do this. There are business owners who are greedy and exploit their employees for sure. Those people often fail in the end. But most business is about someone seeing a need for good or services that others want and they fill that need, creating wealth for themselves and others if they are smart about running their business.im just quoting the articles which align with what ive heard from economists.
so are you saying business ownership is quite concentrated then? this goes back to what reagan might have been saying.
ive heard alot about monopolies these days
You don't seem to understand politics. People believed back then that NAFTA would work out better for everyone. If Clinton had vetoed the bill the veto would have likely been overridden. If it had it would have weakened Clinton and hurt his chances for reelection. And for getting his liberal agenda passed. As was his liberal agenda caused him to lose Congress in the midterms and thus his shift to the right to get reelected.i see that too.
so anyways we shouldnt give clinton a pass on nafta. he definitely could have done something about it based on what i read.
View attachment 519025![]()
North American Free Trade Agreement - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org