They have cooler packs inside of the boxes but the truck gets so hot and there's so much condensation the bottom of the boxes Fall apartHello salmonella
They have cooler packs inside of the boxes but the truck gets so hot and there's so much condensation the bottom of the boxes Fall apartHello salmonella
They should use styrofoam.They have cooler packs inside of the boxes but the truck gets so hot and there's so much condensation the bottom of the boxes Fall apart
I have a couple people on my route look at them on a regular basis so now they leave coolers on the front porch so I can throw it inside of the coolerThey should use styrofoam.
They never will. They make a big deal out of their supposed minimal environmental impact. The messaging is plastered all over the box.They should use styrofoam.
Hello salmonella
Your own sauna…remember thinking it’s so hot outside how could you sweat any more….then you open that bulkhead and go in the back for a minute just to find out it is possibleAnything. I had a solid aluminum bulkhead door, no vent. It was like an inferno in back.
You probably put them in your lunchbox and took them home to cook on the WeberI've already had meat patties fall out of the bottom of the box.
Maybe if I needed some dog food...You probably put them in your lunchbox and took them home to cook on the Weber
It'll surely be a symbolic action, of course, e.g., a protest, since the 804 also has a "no strike clause". I was just reading through their supplement yesterday.Was just getting on to post this. I wonder what the "rally" will entail.
If you go down a dirt road with bulkhead door open the cargo area will be so full of dust you can’t see anything back thereCould have that door be made of something else to allow airflow.
It'll surely be a symbolic action, of course, e.g., a protest, since the 804 also has a "no strike clause". I was just reading through their supplement yesterday.
I have had some success at firing up some coworkers by pointing out: over 2 years ago our brothers and sisters in Local 988 alleged that the company had made a serious violation of the contract by installing the damn cameras without bargaining. In the meantime, as that grievance got deadlocked at every step of the procedure, the company was allowed to continue installing the damn cameras across the country. However, if the company alleges that any of us have seriously violated policy and/or the contract, they will take our badges, walk us to the gate, and we will not be allowed to work until we win (or get reinstated) at a grievance hearing. In what world is that the result of a fair agreement?
I say, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Either the company must remove all cameras, and cease and desist from installing more, until it is proven innocent at a hearing, or the company must grant us the same lenience, e.g., all terminations must be "working terminations" all the way up to arbitration, until a decision is reached.
DHL was able to fight these cameras…fwiwIt'll surely be a symbolic action, of course, e.g., a protest, since the 804 also has a "no strike clause". I was just reading through their supplement yesterday.
I have had some success at firing up some coworkers by pointing out: over 2 years ago our brothers and sisters in Local 988 alleged that the company had made a serious violation of the contract by installing the damn cameras without bargaining. In the meantime, as that grievance got deadlocked at every step of the procedure, the company was allowed to continue installing the damn cameras across the country. However, if the company alleges that any of us have seriously violated policy and/or the contract, they will take our badges, walk us to the gate, and we will not be allowed to work until we win (or get reinstated) at a grievance hearing. In what world is that the result of a fair agreement?
I say, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Either the company must remove all cameras, and cease and desist from installing more, until it is proven innocent at a hearing, or the company must grant us the same lenience, e.g., all terminations must be "working terminations" all the way up to arbitration, until a decision is reached.
There should be some injunction against using them until it’s arbitrated.It'll surely be a symbolic action, of course, e.g., a protest, since the 804 also has a "no strike clause". I was just reading through their supplement yesterday.
I have had some success at firing up some coworkers by pointing out: over 2 years ago our brothers and sisters in Local 988 alleged that the company had made a serious violation of the contract by installing the damn cameras without bargaining. In the meantime, as that grievance got deadlocked at every step of the procedure, the company was allowed to continue installing the damn cameras across the country. However, if the company alleges that any of us have seriously violated policy and/or the contract, they will take our badges, walk us to the gate, and we will not be allowed to work until we win (or get reinstated) at a grievance hearing. In what world is that the result of a fair agreement?
I say, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Either the company must remove all cameras, and cease and desist from installing more, until it is proven innocent at a hearing, or the company must grant us the same lenience, e.g., all terminations must be "working terminations" all the way up to arbitration, until a decision is reached.
That was my first thought originally, but does not sound like O’Brien wants to arbitrate it. He wants to negotiate it. He must feel the threat of Labor strife would be more reliable than an arbitrator.There should be some injunction against using them until it’s arbitrated.
An injunction until it’s decided one way or another. It’s galling that they would just install them.That was my first thought originally, but does not sound like O’Brien wants to arbitrate it. He wants to negotiate it. He must feel the threat of Labor strife would be more reliable than an arbitrator.
Yep UPS gonna do whatever they want until the very last minuteAn injunction until it’s decided one way or another. It’s galling that they would just install them.
Yep, but an end to every double standard that gives UPS the upper hand.I don't know if I'd want to keep working under those conditions. I'd go for guaranteed back pay.