Israel

[vantexan]

I’m not confused on this issue you are. 60% enrichment 100% means they’re trying to build a bomb along with all the other things they were doing. You should just admit that you don’t care that they were trying to build a bomb that would be more intellectually honest because now you’re being dishonest.

Even funnier is that in your second part of your answer, you admit that you know they were trying to build the bomb and you think it’s OK because somehow it brings stability even though you pretend to be against nuclear proliferation. It blows my mind how dishonest you are with yourself on this issue

Your hatred for Israel and your newfound love of Iran has turned you 100% into a Pro nuclear weapons Warhawk

He keeps harping on 60% enrichment not being for anything but nuclear energy but why would anyone take it to 60% and beyond when they only need 3.5% for nuclear energy? He dances around that every time. Has yet to say whether Iran using a nuke against Israel would make him sad or glad. Based on his past posts hating on Israel he'd be in the streets celebrating if Iran nuked them. @rickyb

 

[oldngray]

Who says they violate international law? And what are the consequences? Seems like most of the world is pretty happy that Iran’s nuclear program has been sent back.

Wake me up when this international law force has any authority to prosecute anything.

Some unelected globalist saying it violates international law means nothing.

The same people never criticize Iran or Hamas for their terrorism.

 

[vantexan]

Who says they violate international law? And what are the consequences? Seems like most of the world is pretty happy that Iran’s nuclear program has been sent back.

Wake me up when this international law force has any authority to prosecute anything.

A law that doesn’t have any penalty or any enforcement is nothing more than a suggestion.

Apparently international law doesn't apply to Iran funding terrorism if it's killing Jews.

 

[vantexan]

Some unelected globalist saying it violates international law means nothing.

The same people never criticize Iran or Hamas for their terrorism.

You beat me to it!

 

[oldngray]

He keeps harping on 60% enrichment not being for anything but nuclear energy but why would anyone take it to 60% and beyond when they only need 3.5% for nuclear energy? He dances around that every time. Has yet to say whether Iran using a nuke against Israel would make him sad or glad. Based on his past posts hating on Israel he'd be in the streets celebrating if Iran nuked them. @rickyb

It's a small step from 60% to weapons grade. No legitimate civilian need for it.

 

[Thebrownblob]

He keeps harping on 60% enrichment not being for anything but nuclear energy but why would anyone take it to 60% and beyond when they only need 3.5% for nuclear energy? He dances around that every time. Has yet to say whether Iran using a nuke against Israel would make him sad or glad. Based on his past posts hating on Israel he'd be in the streets celebrating if Iran nuked them. @rickyb

He’s really not even dancing. The dance floor is closed. There will be no need to build a fortified underground bunker along with 60% enrichment as well as many other items and things we probably don’t even know about their top secret.. there really was never any debate that Iran was trying to enrich uranium to build a bomb. The only debate was if the bomb was built yet or not.

He tries to have Iran play the sympathetic character, and it gives them stability. The fact is Iran is nothing more than a terrorist regime. They deserve no sympathy.

 

[Thebrownblob]

Some unelected globalist saying it violates international law means nothing.

The same people never criticize Iran or Hamas for their terrorism.

Exactly

 

[Thebrownblob]

Apparently international law doesn't apply to Iran funding terrorism if it's killing Jews.

They certainly love killing Jews, but they don’t really have any problem killing Arabs, Americans or pretty much anybody they get in the way through their terrorist network.

 

[Thebrownblob]

It's a small step from 60% to weapons grade. No legitimate civilian need for it.

Exactly and they would be no legitimate need for them to be trying to hide this in bunkers very deep beneath the ground because no one would bomb them for trying to use civilian grade uranium.

 

[Darmark7]

As I said before, the same people that are telling you that you are wrong and hearing wrong news was OK with Biden and are COVID vaxed. I wouldn’t waste my time.

 

[oldngray]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1938065929080099159

 

[rickyb]

He keeps harping on 60% enrichment not being for anything but nuclear energy but why would anyone take it to 60% and beyond when they only need 3.5% for nuclear energy? He dances around that every time. Has yet to say whether Iran using a nuke against Israel would make him sad or glad. Based on his past posts hating on Israel he'd be in the streets celebrating if Iran nuked them. @rickyb

im just quoting mearsheimer. you can have 60 and not build a nuke weapon

 

[rickyb]

Who says they violate international law? And what are the consequences? Seems like most of the world is pretty happy that Iran’s nuclear program has been set back.

Wake me up when this international law force has any authority to prosecute anything.

A law that doesn’t have any penalty or any enforcement is nothing more than a suggestion.

intl law is complied with over 90% of the time

 

[rickyb]

I’m sorry this answer does not align with your new philosophy on nuclear weapons. You say they bring stability. You do like them.

The idea that Iran would not get attacked if they had nuclear weapons is ridiculous. Iran attacked Israel during this conflict and Israel never used theirs. Iran didn’t seem one bit worried about Israel launching a nuclear weapon against them.

mearsheimer says that and uses lybia, ukraine, and iraq as an example

im sure iran was worried and theres indeed possibility israel does use it in demonic fashion

 

[rickyb]

I’m not confused on this issue you are. 60% enrichment 100% means they’re trying to build a bomb along with all the other things they were doing. You should just admit that you don’t care that they were trying to build a bomb that would be more intellectually honest because now you’re being dishonest.

Even funnier is that in your second part of your answer, you admit that you know they were trying to build the bomb and you think it’s OK because somehow it brings stability even though you pretend to be against nuclear proliferation. It blows my mind how dishonest you are with yourself on this issue

Your hatred for Israel and your newfound love of Iran has turned you 100% into a Pro nuclear weapons Warhawk

no im not confused im quoting mearsheimer

 

[rickyb]

How many non-military target civilians do you figure there are inside Israel's borders?

If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does a platypus still dream in technicolor?

 

[Thebrownblob]

im just quoting mearsheimer. you can have 60 and not build a nuke weapon

Well, he’s being obtuse and you know that. There is no legitimate civilian reason to enrich uranium that high.

Again, I’m not suggesting that Iran is not a sovereign country and cannot do that. They certainly can, but there will be consequences.

 

[vantexan]

im just quoting mearsheimer. you can have 60 and not build a nuke weapon

Can you tell us which countries are enriching to 60% or more just for nuclear power? If you can find one are they doing it in a concrete reinforced bunker 200 ft below ground? If it's all innocent then why do that? Why build a converter facility that isn't needed or used for nuclear power? Only for weapons?

 

[Thebrownblob]

intl law is complied with over 90% of the time

Compliance and enforcement are really not the same thing.

90% of the time I comply with the speed limit. But if I didn’t, and there was nobody to give me a ticket and enforced me paying it or doing jail time it wouldn’t really matter.

 

[vantexan]

Compliance and enforcement are really not the same thing.

90% of the time I comply with the speed limit. But if I didn’t, and there was nobody to give me a ticket and enforced me paying it or doing jail time it wouldn’t really matter.

I've driven in cities where everyone around me was driving faster than the limit. It's actually safer to keep up with them than force everyone to go around.