Israel

[Thebrownblob]

The war ended quickly

Yeah, I called that a success. Because I’m anti-war and anti-nuclear proliferation.

 

[Thebrownblob]

Many ppl i listen to do

You should ask why many of your commentators do not

I listen to many of the same people that doesn’t mean they’re correct. You have to have a real world application sometimes to a faculty lounge theory.


If you stick your head in the sand and pretend international law can help or save you, you won’t have a country very long.

Which is why I have told you I believe Iran should do what they think is in their best interest. They just have to understand that others might not agree. This is the law of the jungle, and that law always wins. Every action has a reaction and a consequence.

 

[vantexan]

Youre saying usa never enriched to 90% to get its nukes lol?

I said no such thing. Of course we enriched uranium to 90% for our weapons. But I'll bet a million dollars that our nuclear power plants are using uranium at 3.5-4% not 90 or even 60%.

 

[rickyb]

Yeah, I called that a success. Because I’m anti-war and anti-nuclear proliferation.

Me too. The whole thing was prevetable

But wait didnt you support the war in iran?

 

[UnionStrong]

I said no such thing. Of course we enriched uranium to 90% for our weapons. But I'll bet a million dollars that our nuclear power plants are using uranium at 3.5-4% not 90 or even 60%.

I believe it would be dangerous to use highly enriched uranium in reactors

 

[Thebrownblob]

Me too. The whole thing was prevetable

But wait didnt you support the war in iran?

Yes, it was preventable Iran could stop being a state terrorist sponsor, and stop trying to do things like enrich uranium to make a weapon that most of the world doesn’t want them to have.

When did I support any war in Iran and when do we have a war in Iran? The United States had no war. I was initially apprehensive about Trump bombing Iran, but apparently he was smarter than me because the war between Israel and Iran was over the day after. That was a great success for the world.

 

[UnionStrong]

Iran is already saying our bases could be targeted again. They don’t sound very contrite. Maybe a few more busters up their asses?

 

[vantexan]

I said no such thing. Of course we enriched uranium to 90% for our weapons. But I'll bet a million dollars that our nuclear power plants are using uranium at 3.5-4% not 90 or even 60%.

@rickyb And you still can't point to a single country that has nuclear power, but no weapons, that is enriching at 60% or more(except for Iran who mysteriously just ended their program for now).

 

[Thebrownblob]

Iran is already saying our bases could be targeted again. They don’t sound very contrite. Maybe a few more busters up their asses?

Saber rattling is really common place in the Middle East. Acting tough so they can give propaganda to their people.

 

[rickyb]

Yes, it was preventable Iran could stop being a state terrorist sponsor, and stop trying to do things like enrich uranium to make a weapon that most of the world doesn’t want them to have.

When did I support any war in Iran and when do we have a war in Iran? The United States had no war. I was initially apprehensive about Trump bombing Iran, but apparently he was smarter than me because the war between Israel and Iran was over the day after. That was a great success for the world.

So you supported the bombings which is war

Trump calls it a 12 day war btw

 

[rickyb]

@rickyb And you still can't point to a single country that has nuclear power, but no weapons, that is enriching at 60% or more(except for Iran who mysteriously just ended their program for now).

All the countries that have nukes enriched to 90 at some point. So about 10 countries

 

[Thebrownblob]

@rickyb And you still can't point to a single country that has nuclear power, but no weapons, that is enriching at 60% or more(except for Iran who mysteriously just ended their program for now).

He can’t give you that example because it does not exist. He is trying to the idea that he thinks Iran should have a nuclear weapon now. Of course it’s for deterrent only lol. I mean, how are they going to protect themselves without one one even though they just did?

 

[vantexan]

I believe it would be dangerous to use highly enriched uranium in reactors

Highly likely they keep it to 3.5%-4% for a very serious reason.

 

[UnionStrong]

Saber rattling is really common place in the Middle East. Acting tough so they can give propaganda to their people.

I can’t imagine them agreeing to inspections of sites or giving up uranium stockpiles, let alone recognizing Israel’s right to exist. This isn’t over.

 

[Thebrownblob]

So you supported the bombings which is war

Trump calls it a 12 day war btw

So you didn’t read my comment? I said I was apprehensive about it, but apparently I was wrong because instead of inflaming a war, it ended it. He understood the psychology of these two countries better than I did.

 

[Thebrownblob]

I can’t imagine them agreeing to inspections of sites or giving up uranium stockpiles, let alone recognizing Israel’s right to exist. This isn’t over.

Nope, I’ve said many times. This is not over the best we can hope for is just that it’s over “for now.”

Pretty much just like the last couple thousand years

 

[vantexan]

All the countries that have nukes enriched to 90 at some point. So about 10 countries

Again numb skull, point to one country that has nuclear power reactors but no nuclear weapons that is enriching to 60% or more? Just one. Come on, you've got this. Tell us!

 

[vantexan]

He can’t give you that example because it does. He is trying to the idea that he thinks Iran should have a nuclear weapon now. Of course it’s for deterrent only lol. I mean, how are they going to protect themselves without one one even though they just did?

Israel is supposed to have at least 90 with enough material to make many more. Iran isn't going into this thinking they'll match Israel and deter them from a future attack. They want to get that first one and immediately use it. Probably think in a country Israel's size it'll cease to exist as a viable country. The Palestinians can mop up the rest of it with help from the surrounding countries.

 

[Thebrownblob]

Israel is supposed to have at least 90 with enough material to make many more. Iran isn't going into this thinking they'll match Israel and deter them from a future attack. They want to get that first one and immediately use it. Probably think in a country Israel's size it'll cease to exist as a viable country. The Palestinians can mop up the rest of it with help from the surrounding countries.

I’ve heard that. And it could be true although I think it would be a silly idea because the Palestinians would probably be dead too. Or eventually, be dead from the radiation. And that doesn’t even count any retaliation on their own country from another nuclear power. I do not believe we will be able to ultimately stop them from having a nuclear weapon at some point. I think that is a reality maybe not right now but eventually.

 

[vantexan]

I’ve heard that. And it could be true although I think it would be a silly idea because the Palestinians would probably be dead too. Or eventually, be dead from the radiation. And that doesn’t even count any retaliation on their own country from another nuclear power. I do not believe we will be able to ultimately stop them from having a nuclear weapon at some point. I think that is a reality maybe not right now but eventually.

Taking out Tel Aviv in the north would have little effect on the West Bank. They won't be able to produce something as powerful as what we have. Probably not any worse than Hiroshima. Israel would still be able to retaliate and so probably would we but I don't really think the mullahs care. They have 92 million people to feed. Losing 20% of their population, even 50%, would probably make things easier for them. I really think they're that crazy but for now it's a moot point.