J6 Hearing

728ups

All Trash No Trailer
FfE3DDnUoAIw8xo.jpg
 

Lineandinitial

Legio patria nostra
They used legal means to rig the election, in that they legally shopped for favorable rulings timed in a way that challenges and appeals to these unconstitutional election laws wouldn't be heard until after the election.
One of several "inadequacies" in the rules that no honest group or person would imagine could be carried. Not unlike 9/11.
"Legal"? Yes....
"Ethical"? Not at all based on previous contests.

It's a new world.
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
It's a new world.
Lack of ethics and morality has always existed in the old world. Especially in politics.
What's new is the dumb bastards think we're too stupid to figure it out.
But, what they have going for them is, half the country is that stupid , uninformed, and don't care enough to be informed.
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
"Through the testimony of as many as 1,000 witnesses—including Trump’s top White House aides, his top campaign officials, his top Justice Department staffers, Republican politicians in swing states whom he urged to fake the numbers, officials in law enforcement agencies, outside aides and hangers-on in Trumpworld, and even some of his children—the committee has made a highly persuasive case that Trump had planned to claim victory months before Election Day, and that he indeed claimed victory on and after Election Day, even though he privately admitted that he knew he’d lost. Not only did he deliberately continue his deception right up to January 6th—indeed, he is continuing it to this very day—but he summoned a violent mob to D.C. and loosed it on the Capitol knowing full well many in that mob were armed to the teeth."

The American Prospect
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
"Some new details, however, strengthened the committee’s case. Detail one was the revelation that, just one week after the election, Trump ordered the Defense Department to withdraw all U.S. forces from Afghanistan and Somalia by January 15th, so he could claim to have ended those interventions before his presidency ended. (The ancillary message the committee was putting out, of course, is that if you think Biden’s Afghan withdrawal was precipitous, you should have seen what Trump ordered—which Defense officials resolutely ignored.)"

TAP
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
"Detail four was a host of email and other messages among Secret Service agents and other security agencies, detailing their advance knowledge of just how violent January 6th would be, and that White House officials were privy to these messages. (Fortunately, many of those who brought guns planned to use them only if Trump invoked the Insurrection Act, which, they wrongly believed, would have given them legal sanction to start shooting.)"

TAP
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
"Detail six was a previously unheard question-and-answer sequence in which Trump’s White House counsel Pat Cipollone was asked by Rep. Liz Cheney about the many people who urged Trump to tell the mob to leave the Capitol. “Who in the White House,” she asked, “didn’t want those people to leave the Capitol?” Cipollone paused and then said, “I can’t think of anybody on staff who didn’t want them to leave.” Then Cheney asked him whether Trump did, to which Cipollone, as Trump’s lawyer, said he couldn’t answer that.

So everyone on Trump’s staff, not to mention Trump’s kids, Cabinet members, the military, members of Congress from both parties, Fox News hosts et al. pleaded with him to call the mob off. Only Trump thought that was a bad idea."

TAP
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
For example, this is what Susie calls "legally" rigging the election:
It was legal except that it wasn't, and it didn't get to the supreme court until it was too late.

Rigged election.
What part of ‘legal’ confuses you?
Rigged election.
Deal with it.
 
Top