J6 Hearing

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
I didn’t fall for them because I don’t care. Everyone saw what happened J6. The only ones delusional are the ones trying to convince themselves it was just a peaceful protest until ANTIFA showed up.
It was a riot.
The delusional ones are the people trying to convince themselves it was an insurrection and our democracy was almost lost because someone put his feet on pelosi's desk.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
If you say so. Still far ahead of those believing Trump won, the election was stolen, it wasn’t an insurrection, Trump was hard on Russia, Trump hasn’t played his supporters for millions in “legal fees”, the economy was better under Trump, Trump will be reinstalled on _________(fill in the date),….

You get the point. Trump is a cult leader with a cult following that took over the Republican Party. That’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s right in plain view.
What a fine kettle of fish we have. I will take our wild eyed Trump supporters who want affordable energy, secure borders, a strong business environment, a crackdown on crime, and a strong military over the far Left's whiniest excuses for human beings who want to destroy the country in the name of equity. What has 1.5 years of Democratic rule gotten us? Seriously?
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
I didn’t fall for them because I don’t care. Everyone saw what happened J6. The only ones delusional are the ones trying to convince themselves it was just a peaceful protest until ANTIFA showed up.
the only ones delusional are the ones thinking the J6 committee is anything but a political kangaroo court.
 

PT Car Washer

Well-Known Member
didnt realize trump was talking about eliminating the filibuster or packing the supreme court . thought that was some dem.
trump had already packed the court with his own people. Even when he was a lame duck president. trump controlled the US government and the voters threw him and his Republicans out of power.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
trump had already packed the court with his own people. Even when he was a lame duck president. trump controlled the US government and the voters threw him and his Republicans out of power.
dude your side is trying to run the table in every way possible to bypass the seperation of powers. there is no way you can even think to try to claim the moral high ground on this issue. just admit it was stupid of you to even try to make that argument and move on. dont embarass yourself anymore . bow out of this one gracefully.
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
trump had already packed the court
Trump did not increase the number of justices.
Words have meaning, try again.

Screenshot_20220708-233339_Chrome.jpg
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
trump had already packed the court with his own people. Even when he was a lame duck president. trump controlled the US government and the voters threw him and his Republicans out of power.
Do you expect a conservative president to not appoint conservative justices? And he worked within the current system. "Packing" means adding more than 9 total justices. For example if the Dems decided to make SCOTUS have 13 justices, adding 4 more liberal judges, then the balance of power would change to a 7 to 6 liberal court. And of course the Republicans could do the same and likely would when they have total control again. Saw a guy say eventually SCOTUS would need a football stadium for all the justices.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
How would you know? I thought right wing media was boycotting it.
your question does not acknowledge the lack of cross examination, due process , rebuttal nor complete discovery.

it is meant to be a diversionary response in defense of the kangaroo court.
 

oldngray

nowhere special
your question does not acknowledge the lack of cross examination, due process , rebuttal nor complete discovery.

it is meant to be a diversionary response in defense of the kangaroo court.
J6 committee threw out the House rules for their little show.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
FOX covered the first hearing and has been showing various testimonies since.
fox news itself is corporate media that at best will chase news stories important to conservative viewers while the rest of corporate media ignores any story that is negative to the DNC.

fox will cover the kangaroo court but unlike corporate liberal media will allow world reknown legal experts on to point out that the kangaroo court has kangaroo's.

this in the eyes of liberal lynch artists like @bbsam infuriates them when they should be outraged at this waste of tax payer dollars and political gamesmanship.
 

oldngray

nowhere special
fox news itself is corporate media that at best will chase news stories important to conservative viewers while the rest of corporate media ignores any story that is negative to the DNC.

fox will cover the kangaroo court but unlike corporate liberal media will allow world reknown legal experts on to point out that the kangaroo court has kangaroo's.

this in the eyes of liberal lynch artists like @bbsam infuriates them when they should be outraged at this waste of tax payer dollars and political gamesmanship.
Fox does lean right but also shows the liberal side too. Not nearly as conservative as it used to be. Of course it does stand out since it isn't 100% liberal like almost everyone else.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Fox does lean right but also shows the liberal side too. Not nearly as conservative as it used to be. Of course it does stand out since it isn't 100% liberal like almost everyone else.
its definitely shifted to the middle in recent years. in fairness to them I suppose they should show the kangaroo court which they did if for no other reason than to entertain us on the absurdity of such a shennanigan.
 

zubenelgenubi

I'm a star
its definitely shifted to the middle in recent years. in fairness to them I suppose they should show the kangaroo court which they did if for no other reason than to entertain us on the absurdity of such a shennanigan.

We're footing the bill, we might as well get the entertainment value out of it. I find it hilarious how little these people think of their personal integrity, and how happy they are to show off their sub 85 IQ's. Imagine how dumb the people who keep electing them must be.
 
Top