LGBTQ

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
There was a guy in his 70s with a store, had a sign in his window that said ‘if you were born with a dk you ain’t a chick’. The mayor of the town is a trans woman. She went down to the store to confront him. He basically threw him/her out! He said you don’t look like a woman and you don’t act like a woman. H said he’s to old to give sht what anyone thinks
 

Operational needs

Virescit Vulnere Virtus
Hilarious


There was a guy in his 70s with a store, had a sign in his window that said ‘if you were born with a dk you ain’t a chick’. The mayor of the town is a trans woman. She went down to the store to confront him. He basically threw him/her out! He said you don’t look like a woman and you don’t act like a woman. H said he’s to old to give sht what anyone thinks
 

El Correcto

god is dead
“The paper was ridiculous by intention, essentially arguing that penises shouldn’t be thought of as male genital organs but as damaging social constructions. We made no attempt to find out what “post-structuralist discursive gender theory” actually means. We assumed that if we were merely clear in our moral implications that maleness is intrinsically bad and that the penis is somehow at the root of it, we could get the paper published in a respectable journal.

Manspreading — a complaint levied against men for sitting with their legs spread wide — is akin to raping the empty space around him.

This already damning characterization of our hoax understates our paper’s lack of fitness for academic publication by orders of magnitude. We didn’t try to make the paper coherent; instead, we stuffed it full of jargon (like “discursive” and “isomorphism”), nonsense (like arguing that hypermasculine men are both inside and outside of certain discourses at the same time), red-flag phrases (like “pre-post-patriarchal society”), lewd references to slang terms for the penis, insulting phrasing regarding men (including referring to some men who choose not to have children as being “unable to coerce a mate”), and allusions to rape (we stated that “manspreading,” a complaint levied against men for sitting with their legs spread wide, is “akin to raping the empty space around him”). After completing the paper, we read it carefully to ensure it didn’t say anything meaningful, and as neither one of us could determine what it is actually about, we deemed it a success.”

I love these stories about academics going rogue and writing a bunch of meaningless bull:censored2: just to get published by radical leftists so they can turn around and make fun of the radicals.
 
Top