Like a miracle

[MAKAVELI]

There's a direct link to the WHO guidance on recalibrating machines to a lower CT threshold which results in fewer positive tests.

I'm sorry if it's over your head little lady.

Fake News

 

[Sportello]

LMFAO, more Facebook funded "fact-checking".
Hilarious!!!!
View attachment 327967

Who would be an acceptable fact checker for you? RT?

 

[Sportello]

Comments like this are beneath you.

No, they are what you are.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

No, they are what you are.

Good, Good

 

[Sportello]

Good, Good

Fascists gonna Fascist.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

Who would be an acceptable fact checker for you? RT?

There's a direct link to the WHO guidance on recalibrating machines to a lower CT threshold which results in fewer positive tests.

For some reason, you need Facebook "fact checkers" to spin the truth so it seemingly fits your narrow worldview.

Carry on.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

Fascists gonna Fascist.

No doubt, I'll pray for you fascists.

 

[Sportello]

There's a direct link to the WHO guidance on recalibrating machines to a lower CT threshold which results in fewer positive tests.

For some reason, you need Facebook "fact checkers" to spin the truth so it seemingly fits your narrow worldview.

Carry on.

I'm getting confused, do we now trust the WHO or not? Did you actually read the WHO guidance or rely on a fringe web site to interpret it for you?

Let me help you out:

WHO Information Notice for Users 2020/05

Product type: Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 Date: 13 January 2021 WHO-identifier: 2020/5, version 2 Target audience: laboratory professionals and...

www.who.int

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

I'm getting confused....

Clearly.

In the article I posted, there's a direct link to the WHO guidance on recalibrating machines to a lower CT threshold which results in fewer positive tests.

For some reason, you need Facebook "fact checkers" to spin the truth so it seemingly fits your narrow worldview.

Carry on.

 

[Sportello]

Clearly.

In the article I posted, there's a direct link to the WHO guidance on recalibrating machines to a lower CT threshold which results in fewer positive tests.

For some reason, you need Facebook "fact checkers" to spin the truth so it seemingly fits your narrow worldview.

Carry on.

Thanks for confirming that you are confusing.

Is it late night radio that makes you this way? Change the station.

 

[Tom MacDonald]

Fact check: WHO released guidance on proper use of tests; it did not admit PCR tests showed inflated infection numbers

Social media users have been sharing screenshots purporting that the World Health Organization (WHO) released guidance to laboratories and incorrectly saying this was to reduce the positive test result count in PCR (polymerase chain reaction) COVID-19 tests. The social media...

www.reuters.com

Reuters also says that only 300 of the 460,000 CHILDREN missing every year are under the age of 21.

Right @fishtm2001 ?

 

[Tom MacDonald]

Thanks for confirming that you are confusing.

Is it late night radio that makes you this way? Change the station.

I'd bet 100 dollars that zero people clicked play

 

[Tom MacDonald]

Fake News

Go through your post history and count how many times you posted that.

Dont you have more to say?

 

[Tom MacDonald]

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

Thanks for confirming that you are confusing.

Only to those who are easily confused.
Carry on little lady.

 

[Tom MacDonald]

I find it amazing that close to a third of healthcare workers are declining the vaccine.

Are you going to have Joe Biden vet our health care system for "radicals" like he did with our military?