proups: "have you ever paused to think that the reason the "specific instances" that don't seem to faze the corporate lawyers you have spoken to don't violate state law? "
One would think that was true, but unfortunately it isn't. We do, on a regular basis violate state law.I work with local counsel on a regular basis and they agree, as a company, we will eventually get caught not complying with state laws.
proups: "Once again, I ask you to give me case law that prohibits a company from changing a
company-administered benefit. You are avoiding my request. Go look, it is out there, but you won't like what you find"
You need to re-read some posts. I never said a company can't change the rules. I simply said they need to pay off what is owed.
proups: "I wonder who is really naive?"
Evidently I have to repeat myself. It is you proups that is naive, and for the same reason I stated in my first post.