Okay Obama haters......allow me to hijack your thread, cause this is going nowhere and it's boring listening to you'all reassure each other like a flock of seaguls.
I know most of you defended GW on all our problems like a Guiliani broken record, ...9-11.....9-11....9-11.... and also blame the Dem majority led Congress.
Well now, I'm going to point out a defense mechanism inherited to the Obama Adm the moment he swore in....It's called the Bush/Cheney GOP-Republican Administration and all who supported it that left this country in such dis-array in facing this "Great Depression"-like financial dire consequence in the form of massive unprecedented debt and burrowing never seen before in the history of the world, decimated middle-class, spiraling unemployment, and a backassward foriegn policy recruiting more terrorist than eliminating them, resulting in our allies pretending not to know us.
This new Adm is probably facing it's toughest challenge this term with this Stimulus Bill the moment the new drapes were hung and the new presidential rug was laid, so we should get a good indication of Obama's first 100 days, eventhough it will take year(s) climbing out of this GOP hole.
As far as "change", any form of transparentcy and shift in ideaology (even with some old familar faces) from the previous 2 Adm's is "change", and an abilility to beat a pre-planned GOP partyline fillerbuster approach for a chance to implement this Adm's new agenda in order for us to judge the first 100 days.
Indicators already show partyline stubborness in the House and Senate instead of loyalties towards the resident's woes in their home state districts. However, there looks like there are 3 sensible Rep Senators who will tip the scale and pass the Bill in the Senate and will definately get the evil eye and cold shoulder from their constituents...
I will concede, if anything seems similiar, is their foriegn policy approach towards the troops in the Middle East...I'm not liken it, and will reserve comment and hold them to their 16 month pledge, but I'm sure our "gung-ho" war monger crowd should'nt be to upset about that sort of change....
D,
You and I know that in many areas of economics and politics, probably even religion, we are oceans apart but much of what you said was dead on point. America didn't elect Obama, George Bush and the republican party elected President Obama. It was their wasteful years at the helm that has gotten us to where we are. Oh you can blame democrats and that is very true but if the former watchman gives the thieves keys to the warehouse and the new watchman knows this and completely fails to change the locks, then that watchman accepts full responsibility for the thefts that take place as a result. Now we can argue if Obama is changing the locks or not, I don't believe he is, put the fact is Obama is dealing right now with thefts that occured on the previous shift but at some point he will be dealing with his own.
That all said, just for fun I did a search of "George W Bush>non defense spending" and here are a few article I found in the search results. And no, none of them are from left wing, commie, democrat or whatever the fun flavor of the day is.
From Reason magazine circa 2005'
http://www.reason.com/news/show/34112.html
Also from Reason Jan. 26, 2009' (a version of this ran in the Wall Street Journal on Jan. 24th)
http://www.reason.com/news/show/131264.html
And from the late Harry Browne circa 2004'
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig/browne4.html
This is just the tip of the iceberg but the simple fact is we got President Obama because like dumb leemings, republicans and so-called conservatives put fiscal principles aside and followed blindly into the night and dawn came to shed light on the utter disaster those years in power really were. Now I do believe in time President Obama and his fellow travelers will try and give Bush and the boys a run for their, ops I'm sorry, a run for OUR money and we'll be even worse than we are. But right now, this situation is republican caused because as the night watchman, they took a nap and allowed havoc to run amuck in Washington.
BTW D, more bad news Dude but it's on a different note. Glenn Greenwald points out another Obama broken promise.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/02/09/state_secrets/index.html
and here's a follow up piece to that
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/02/10/obama/index.html
Glenn also makes a point about the Bush adminstration press conferences. I'm just speechless
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/02/11/journalists/index.html
You really have to sit back and honestly ask yourself these days, was this purely a Bush thing or if not now, will it also become a practice of the Obama camp at some point. I'm betting good money this is just typical gov't policy no matter whose in there. The last thing they want is for some spirited and true journalist to point out the obvious about the King's lack of clothing!
