I am not sure who should take the responsibility for the failure of OPL. What I do know is that it was part of many of our incentives. It was growing and we were all happy about it. Then the IRS trouble began, in the end, it would appear as if the company (OPL) was a legit one and possibly could have gone on. (Just my opinion-I have no hard facts to back that up) In the meantime, we were unable to sell any shares (with the exception of a few years when we could only sell 10%) and were forced to watch our investment be driven into the ground by some inept and WELL-paid people. I wonder if any of their compensation was based on the success of the stock price?
There are those that will say that these same people stand to lose just like the rest of us. That may be true, but in my opinion they were paid to make sure that NONE of us lost!
I have heard the theory that we got the stock for free and we should be happy with what we get because it was given to us. Well, I am of the opinion that it was part of my pay and therefore it was not FREE I earned it. When I earn something and invest it I would like to see a reasonable profit on my investment. Mary and her counter parts took care of that part for us didnt she! To add insult to injury, we were unable to unload a losing investment.
So, who is to blame for this debacle? I guess you can point fingers at a few sources. I would like to get the boards consensus on who they feel is to blame and why. I would be interested in finding out how many others share my opinion and/or have their own.
Michael