Parler Conservative site.
- Thread starter Operational needs
- Start date
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
You're wrong, the BLM terrorists are still organizing there.
newfie
Well-Known Member
their worried about getting sued for starting a riot.
the DNC , Media and now social Media is all in Lockstep. This whole event reeks of an organized and carefully orchestrated event.
Let me know when they've attacked the US Congress.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Nice deflection leftie.
There's no such thing as suppression of First Amendment-protected speech by private companies. It's the government that can't stop you from saying whatever you want. And even then, there are limitations. Speech that incites violent insurrection is one of them.
zimbomb
Well-Known Member
Scraped Parler data is a metadata gold mine | TechCrunch
Many of the videos uploaded to Parler and since scraped still contained location data.
techcrunch.com
oldngray
nowhere special
These companies should lose their 230 protection when they step in and become publishers.
Every Deleted Parler Post, Many With Users' Location Data, Has Been ArchivedScraped Parler data is a metadata gold mine | TechCrunch
Many of the videos uploaded to Parler and since scraped still contained location data.
"Parler investor Dan Bongino, a Fox News commentator and former NYPD police officer, said in a Parler post on Saturday — shared on Twitter by BuzzFeed reporter John Paczkowski — that the company was “not done with Apple and Google” and encouraged users to “Stay tuned to hear what’s coming.” One user replied: “It would be a pity if someone with explosives training were to pay a visit to some AWS Data Centers - the location of which are public knowledge.”
On Sunday, CEO Matze sharply criticized the tech companies’ actions, claiming on Fox News that Amazon, Apple, and Google were attempting to “actually destroy the entire company.” Matze added that the company had also been “ditched” by its lawyers.
It will be fine
Well-Known Member
There would be far more censorship without 230. You guys realize that, right?
PT Car Washer
Well-Known Member
The attack on the Capitol was not round one, only the latest. Think back to the attempt on the Michigan Governor and the bombing in Nashville. Lots of stuff on the web about other attacks to follow. Yet * DIDO says it all was a peaceful protest.The quelling of violent speech is not some sort of tyrannist act.
"After "hang Mike Pence" began to trend on Twitter late Friday and early Saturday, the social media company squashed the trend and variations of it."
Twitter Confirms It Halted 'Hang Mike Pence' as a Trending Topic
The topic trended briefly, with many people quoting Trump supporters who invaded the Capitol Wednesday chanting the phrase as a noose awaited outside.www.newsweek.com
The current "conservative view" is that the Presidential election was fraudulent and something must be done about it before it's too late. And here we are, 9 days from the inauguration of the next President. And we've already seen what some conservatives think they needed to do about it during round 1 of their efforts.
Last edited by a moderator:
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
The cartoon you responded to says "free speech", nothing about the first amendment. Try again leftie.
Sportello
Well-Known Member
Your post is inaccurate. But I know you're only repeating what you've been told, so your ignorance is understandable.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Oh boy, you got me with that one roadrunner!
You're so silly lady!
Uumm you do understand that the social media sites work under that with no penalty to themselves. Taking that away allows people to go after them. They/ social media are not news agencies.
The implication of a cartoon suggesting one's free speech rights are being infringed upon has everything to do with the First Amendment.
Sportello
Well-Known Member
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I wonder which amendment this is in?
Sportello
Well-Known Member
Your post is inaccurate. But I know you're only repeating what you've been told, so your ignorance is understandable.
It will be fine
Well-Known Member
Under 230 they aren’t responsible for 3rd party content on their site. Eliminate it and social media will delete everything that might be questionable. Considering a large portion of conservative speech is spruced up White Nationalism, there wouldn’t be much that would make it past the filter.
Similar threads
