anHOURover
Well-Known Member
Can you calm down with the profanity brother. Why must you insult those whose opinion differs ? Is the boss still sore ?Only if you’re mom had a dick.
Can you calm down with the profanity brother. Why must you insult those whose opinion differs ? Is the boss still sore ?Only if you’re mom had a dick.
Hey buggerAnd just like that....
The average intelligence of a UPS Teamster member, is revealed.
Can you calm down with the profanity brother.
Hey bugger
Let’s meet up
I’d love to stick a cucumber in your pie hole
And from now on @BigUnionGuy shall be known as Bug The Thug!
Are you bullying me ? That's so like you BTT.
I’m sorry. I’ll try to reword my posts in the future. Can you find it in your heart to forgive me?Can you calm down with the profanity brother. Why must you insult those whose opinion differs ? Is the boss still sore ?
Didn’t Jumbo retire? I guess @anHOURover still doesn’t realize he has zero pull in his local.And using cucumber, as a metaphor for penis.... is so clever.
You "vote no" people in Local 623 must feel so embarrassed.
Lowest voting % in the entire country.
#623livesmatter....
I really enjoy those podcasts.
-Bug-
It’s called docking. @Indecisi0n can school you.Hey bugger
Let’s meet up
I’d love to stick a cucumber in your pie hole
You're a little confused my friend. You work for UPS Freight. You have a different contract then us. I do not believe they made a 2 tier driver for you guys.
Your contract was voted down and yes you should go to union meetings even though you don't have 45 punches yet.
I’ve learned a lot since that post. I haven’t worked all week so plenty of time to understand this mess. Also got screwed by the skeamsters already “go ahead and turn in your union card” said every steward “we promise they don’t take dues out until your off your probabtion period it just takes a couple weeks to get in the system so they want it ready” they said. I sign the pos card get dues taken out my check the very next week! And all this propaganda from skeamsters is ridiculous. THEY WORK FOR US THEY BRING US DEALS AND WE VOTE THEY DONT GET TO SHOVE BIASED OPINIONS DOWN OUR THROAT DONT EVER LET THESES FORGET WHO THEY WORK FOR! Had to get that off cus the majority seem to think they work for skeamsters and ups. I’m probably just gonna take my cdl and bounce I didn’t sign up to get
ed both ways I only got one
. If I gotta take a 10k pay cut then so be it
all this bs and I didn’t even get to work this week with a possibility of not working at all(which I totally agreed with a no vote the tyranny that is UPS must be controlled). Not what I signed up for. Then I’m getting phone calls non stop and texts telling me to go vote vote this vote that. Suck my gosh darn dick skeamsters im not even thru my 45 punches I CANT vote BUT they sure had no problems taking my dues early and lying in my
ing face. Feels good to pay for protection and representation and not get it boys
I'm glad, you are such an expert on the IBT constitution.
Ask TDU.
Why were they in support of that provision.... back in 1987.
The 50% 2/3 clause is a flawed improvement. At 50.00002% of turnout, there only needed to be 52,261 no votes for contract to be turned down. But if one less person voted, it would need 69,681 no votes to be turned down. Can you see how easy it is to game the vote for yes voters? If you know the vote will be close to 50%, it is better for some yes voters to not vote, as it will cause all no votes to be worth half as much.You do realize this provision is an improvement over how it was worded in the past
Don’t you
The 50% 2/3 clause is a flawed improvement. At 50.00002% of turnout, there only needed to be 52,261 no votes for contract to be turned down. But if one less person voted, it would need 69,681 no votes to be turned down. Can you see how easy it is to game the vote for yes voters? If you know the vote will be close to 50%, it is better for some yes voters to not vote, as it will cause all no votes to be worth half as much.
It really needs changed. I would change it to (needs to have a lawyer overlook for correct wording):
(2) If less than half of the eligible members cast valid ballots, then a two-thirds (2/3) vote of those voting shall be required to reject such final offer and to authorize a strike. The failure of such membership to reject the final offer and to authorize a strike as herein provided shall require the Local Union Executive Boardor to accept such final offer or such additional provisions as can be negotiated by it. The failure of such membership to reject or ratify the final offer shall require a second vote no sooner than 35 days from the previous vote. The second vote shall be decided by a cumulative majority of those voting. The Local Union Executive Board may opt to return to negations instead of a second vote, starting this process over.
This would give ample notice to those who "choose" not to vote to change their minds. Not voting should be counted as an abstain, and should not affect the outcome. If 75% of the eligible voters choose to not vote, they are choosing to defer to the other 25% to determine the outcome for them.
I guess @BigUnionGuy’s not gonna respond