Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
Source?Have you never looked at the multiplier effect of government spending? $1 spent by the government can create $5 increase in GDP. Why do you hate math?
Source?Have you never looked at the multiplier effect of government spending? $1 spent by the government can create $5 increase in GDP. Why do you hate math?
It’s one of the pillars of Keynesian economics. The multiplier can vary depending on perspective but it’s a real effect. This isn’t far out economic thought. It’s basic.Source?
He's a communist.Source?
Basic if you believe Keynes was correct.It’s one of the pillars of Keynesian economics. The multiplier can vary depending on perspective but it’s a real effect. This isn’t far out economic thought. It’s basic.
Wrong. It’s a basic concept that no one disputes. People will debate exactly how large the multiplier is but not weather a multiplier effect exists.Basic if you believe Keynes was correct.
Many people dispute Keynes. His theories were popular for a while but have been shown to not work in the real world.Wrong. It’s a basic concept that no one disputes. People will debate exactly how large the multiplier is but not weather a multiplier effect exists.
No one debates the existence of the multiplier effect. No one argues that the economic impact of $1 spent by the government is $1 of GDP growth. That dollar gets spent and becomes income for someone else and then part of that dollar gets spent again. It’s not a controversial concept.Many people dispute Keynes. His theories were popular for a while but have been shown to not work in the real world.
Citing Keynes to justify spending and spending is controversial. If it had the desired effect poverty would've been eliminated long ago.No one debates the existence of the multiplier effect. No one argues that the economic impact of $1 spent by the government is $1 of GDP growth. That dollar gets spent and becomes income for someone else and then part of that dollar gets spent again. It’s not a controversial concept.
I cited the multiplier effect to demonstrate the fallacy that everything provided by the government has to be forcibly taken from someone else. It’s just not how economics works.Citing Keynes to justify spending and spending is controversial. If it had the desired effect poverty would've been eliminated long ago.
Many people dispute Keynes. His theories were popular for a while but have been shown to not work in the real world.
You're saying that government spending $1 creates $5. What you're not saying is that original $1 is worth MORE than the resulting $5.I cited the multiplier effect to demonstrate the fallacy that everything provided by the government has to be forcibly taken from someone else. It’s just not how economics works.
Your argument is as stupid as claiming if Jesus actually cared about poor people there wouldn’t be poverty.
What? 1 is less than 5. The government can create money. That’s how money works.You're saying that government spending $1 creates $5. What you're not saying is that original $1 is worth MORE than the resulting $5.
Only stupidity believes government spending doesn't come from the taxpayer.
But it is what's done to justify overspending. At the end of the day very little changes except we're deeper in debt and servicing that debt takes an ever bigger piece of the Federal pie.I cited the multiplier effect to demonstrate the fallacy that everything provided by the government has to be forcibly taken from someone else. It’s just not how economics works.
Your argument is as stupid as claiming if Jesus actually cared about poor people there wouldn’t be poverty.
Yet printing money got Obama in hot water with some of the nation's biggest creditors. Why should they buy our bonds if their return is worth less and less? Ask the Weimer Republic. You can't print your way out of serious debt without the system eventually collapsing.What? 1 is less than 5. The government can create money. That’s how money works.
By the way Jesus said the poor you'll have with you always.I cited the multiplier effect to demonstrate the fallacy that everything provided by the government has to be forcibly taken from someone else. It’s just not how economics works.
Your argument is as stupid as claiming if Jesus actually cared about poor people there wouldn’t be poverty.
You forgot the rest of the passage...By the way Jesus said the poor you'll have with you always.
This person is aLol, another reason we need charter schools.
School district scraps traditional ‘A-friend’ grading system for kinder, gentler model | The College Fix