thats nonsense that a journalist will report facts without putting their views into it. actually what stops journalists from reporting the facts are access to ppl they depend on for news and advertisers.I vehemently disagree with your claim that America is deeply anti-intellectual. And your issue with the anti-war journalists, that you keep bringing back up, is absolute nonsense. It's like Lenin said, you focus on the hypocrisy, against which there can be no defense, and that is one way you agitate and divide. But this is a fake hypocrisy, made up because you can't think of better evidence to accuse the system over.
Journalists' jobs are to report the facts without putting their views into it. The fact that this almost never happens any more is more of a concern than anti-war journalists' views being stifled. If they wanted to report on the real reasons for the wars, with evidence, and report on the terrible things that happened as a result of war, there was nothing stopping them. If they got fired for going against their employer's wishes, sometimes that's the price of doing the right thing. They could just as easily founded their own outlet and established their own editorial guidelines. I assume that's probably what some did.
So you can stop beating that dead horse of non-self censorship.
moving onto another area, look up what richard wolff says about how they treat unpopular yet major economic theories.
theres all kinds of things where not only it wouldnt do to say, but it wouldnt do to think in the west which points at us not being free. the school system is a propaganda system, the media is a propaganda system, what else am i missing.