THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
As I told Van. if you have corroborated proof of election fraud sufficient to overturn the 2020 election Giuliani, Ellis Eastman and others are BEGGING you to step forward with it. They are facing disciplinary boards and could lose their law licenses. The practice of law is their livelihoods and reports I've read state that Trump never paid them for their time and efforts .
They already presented the proof. They decide not to investigate it
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Because the deep state doesn’t investigate the deep state. Now do u see why we think there is a deep state?
Ok you THINK there is a Deep State. Therefore it is incumbent upon you to prove that there is a Deep State
And now that you THINK that there is a Deep State you're off to a good start proving that there is one.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
They already presented the proof. They decide not to investigate it
What did they produce? In the opinion of 59 out of 60 judges some of them Trump appointees the plaintiffs failed to meet the burden of proof sufficient to have their motions granted . The 60th granted a procedural motion only . Now if the plaintiffs failed to meet the burden of proof with that very same proof you're talking about. in 59 out of 60 federal cases what makes you think that an investigation would produce a different result?
 

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
Ok you THINK there is a Deep State. Therefore it is incumbent upon you to prove that there is a Deep State
And now that you THINK that there is a Deep State you're off to a good start proving that there is one.
Because the only politicians who get investigate are named Donald trump. You are incumbent upon telling me why that is if you are saying there is no deep state
 

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
What did they produce? In the opinion of 59 out of 60 judges some of them Trump appointees the plaintiffs failed to meet the burden of proof sufficient to have their motions granted . The 60th granted a procedural motion only . Now if the plaintiffs failed to meet the burden of proof with that very same proof you're talking about. in 59 out of 60 federal cases what makes you think that an investigation would produce a different result?
Videos showing poll watchers being shut out of polling places, dead people voting or people who no longer live within the state voting in that state, videos of people stuffing boxes with hundreds of envelopes.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Again you willfully ignored the fact that Biden's home was also protected by the Secret Service. He was after all Vice President. Now why did Trump appointed AG Jeff Sessions not appoint a special counsel to investigate Hillary Clinton? According to your reporting there should not have been much trouble finding numerous national security law violations worthy or prosecution.
Nope, when Biden left office in 2017 he didn't have SS protection nor did he as a Senator. And Jeff Sessions was a total disappointment. You know why Hillary wasn't brought to justice? Because they're all up there lining their pockets.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
So now you're at the fallback position of Hunter Biden. I don't have to defend Hunter Biden. He has been under investigation for more than 5 years. A decision will have to be made sooner or later. Either the DOJ has enough on him or they don't
Whatever happens to Hunter Biden one way of the other it's not going to put your Dear leader back in the White House.
Name the official investigation of Hunter Biden.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Again you willfully ignored the fact that Biden's home was also protected by the Secret Service.
Hunter Biden lived at Delaware home where classified docs were kept (nypost.com)

"Disgraced first son Hunter Biden lived off and on at the Delaware home where classified documents from Joe Biden’s time as vice president were found last month — giving him unrestricted access to America’s secrets while he was addicted to drugs, hammering out shady foreign business deals and under federal investigation.

The now-52-year-old began listing the Wilmington home as his address following his 2017 divorce from ex-wife Kathleen Buhle — even falsely claiming he owned the property on a July 2018 background check form as part of a rental application."
So now you're at the fallback position of Hunter Biden.

Fallback position? You were trying to draw equivalencies between the Biden and Trump classified document storage because of the Secret Service presence in both cases and they’re clearly still not similar situations.
 

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
The House impeaches then sends the Articles of Impeachment over to the Senate for them to hold a trial.
So then it doesn’t mean anything. These communist idiots just impeach someon for being conservative so they can say he was impeached. I mean just like they try and say all white people are racist, all Christian churches are hate groups, all men are sexist, etc, etc. just your normal childish nonsense.
 

Next Day Error

X - Other
Serious question:

Former President Trump is a billionaire. Right? He's a billionaire? Let's accept that as a reality for the sake of argument. Trump has racked up some legal fees, ok. Sure. Hundreds of thousands of dollars in the last few months, maybe? Possibly over a million? Alright. But he's a billionaire. A multi-billionaire, according to him. So these legal fees amount to what, a rounding error? Why doesn't he pay for his own legal defense fund? He's asking morons that probably make under $60,000 a year to send him, a multi-billionaire businessman, $30 for his legal defense fund.

LOL

He's not a billionaire. He's a hustler. He's hustling idiots.
 
Top