THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD

bacha29

Well-Known Member
I'm just wondering as someone that doesn’t understand elections like you must. Can you inform me on a few things.
1. How and why does a vote counting sites close down for a water break when there wasn’t a water break?
2. How does multiple vote counting sites stop counting votes in the middle of the night but yet when they resumed counting thousands of votes had been counted and added?
3. How does votes switch live on TV from one candidate to the other.
4. Why would pole watchers be held back from watching and cardboard put over windows where no one could see in?
5. Why would USPS run trailer loads of ballots from one state to another?
6. Why would people be running the same ballot over and over through the voting machines?
7. Why would vans with boxes of ballots be seen pulling into voting stations at 3am (after the deadline) and unloaded?

Im sure there is perfect answers for these questions that I don’t understand. We all have been assured that there was no election fraud and this was the most secure election in history so I’m just wondering what I don’t understand.
And just exactly was your source for these reports? Have they been corroborated and presented to DOJ and the USFEC and investigated by them along with other state and federal agencies? If so what were their findings and final report regarding these matters?
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
And just exactly was your source for these reports? Have they been corroborated and presented to DOJ and the USFEC and investigated by them along with other state and federal agencies? If so what were their findings and final report regarding these matters?
Do you think a Merrick Garland led DOJ would ever find anything in favor of Trump?
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Calls for speculation. Can you tell me why Biden had top secret documents from his time as a Senator when they aren't supposed to be removed from the SCIF where they are securely viewed?
What evidence do you have to offer that says that Senator Biden did not have security clearance to view them. Furthermore what stands out is that they were returned promptly.

It's not speculation when I ask you as part of your unbending defense of Dear Leader to explain how the interests of the United States would have been better served when documents of vital national security were held by and refused to be returned by an unauthorized individual who stored them at an unauthorized and unsecured facility?

Having them there is one thing. Refusing to return them without any legal basis for keeping them is another . Then again he's going to be given the opportunity to prove in court that current rule of law is sufficient grounds for his willful refusal to ignore a federal subpoena requiring a federal warrant.

Instead of tossing out "whataboutisms" as you go flying around like Buzzy The Hummingbird why not show us some federal statutes we could refer to that you believe that will serve as the basis of his defense so we can look them up as well.
 
I’ve made my way down to the Versailles in little Havana. Rumor is our president is going to buy our meals for us tonight.

I saw him checking his cash when he left Doral. Best president ever, he cares about us.
1686861901640.png


I couldn’t get in to Versailles, but I don’t think my President would ever stiff anyone.

Fake news!
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Do you think a Merrick Garland led DOJ would ever find anything in favor of Trump?
The role of the DOJ is NOT to prosecute cases for the purpose of gaining an acquittal. Gaining one is the responsibility of the defendants legal council whether it be hired or court appointed.
 

Darmark7

Retired 2020. Not my Problem Anymore!
And just exactly was your source for these reports? Have they been corroborated and presented to DOJ and the USFEC and investigated by them along with other state and federal agencies? If so what were their findings and final report regarding these matters?

My source for 1 and 2 was living through it. I guess you wasn’t here or have forgotten that night. Strange how you missed it because it was the first time in our history that counting was stopped. 3 and 4 you could watch it happening on TV as it happened. 6 and 7 is on tape showing it happen but I’m sure you would say that’s not what is happening. I have given you examples of why people believe there was election fraud not just someone saying it happened. Please show me how they prove that this election process became secure from when the Democrats was saying the elections were not secure all the years before. We can’t take anyone’s word for anything anymore because we have found out that even 51 intelligence people will lie or be fooled into saying a laptop is Russian disinformation to then say they was wrong.
Below are video of votes flipping. I remember people catching this the same day it happened. I’m sure your interested in watching.



 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
What evidence do you have to offer that says that Senator Biden did not have security clearance to view them. Furthermore what stands out is that they were returned promptly.

It's not speculation when I ask you as part of your unbending defense of Dear Leader to explain how the interests of the United States would have been better served when documents of vital national security were held by and refused to be returned by an unauthorized individual who stored them at an unauthorized and unsecured facility?

Having them there is one thing. Refusing to return them without any legal basis for keeping them is another . Then again he's going to be given the opportunity to prove in court that current rule of law is sufficient grounds for his willful refusal to ignore a federal subpoena requiring a federal warrant.

Instead of tossing out "whataboutisms" as you go flying around like Buzzy The Hummingbird why not show us some federal statutes we could refer to that you believe that will serve as the basis of his defense so we can look them up as well.
Are you really saying this? Congressmen and Senators view top secret and other classified documents in the SCIF. A secured room that the documents requested can be viewed in but can not be taken out of except by the archivist. No one gets to take them home or elsewhere but Biden sure did. You need to understand, he didn't just accidentally take home documents one time then promptly report it. He took home documents over decades then when it came out about Trump it was found out Biden had documents too. But the DOJ isn't interested in prosecuting anyone but Trump.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
The role of the DOJ is NOT to prosecute cases for the purpose of gaining an acquittal. Gaining one is the responsibility of the defendants legal council whether it be hired or court appointed.
You're avoiding the question. Do you think that Merrick Garland would ever find anything in favor of Trump?
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
My source for 1 and 2 was living through it. I guess you wasn’t here or have forgotten that night. Strange how you missed it because it was the first time in our history that counting was stopped. 3 and 4 you could watch it happening on TV as it happened. 6 and 7 is on tape showing it happen but I’m sure you would say that’s not what is happening. I have given you examples of why people believe there was election fraud not just someone saying it happened. Please show me how they prove that this election process became secure from when the Democrats was saying the elections were not secure all the years before. We can’t take anyone’s word for anything anymore because we have found out that even 51 intelligence people will lie or be fooled into saying a laptop is Russian disinformation to then say they was wrong.
Below are video of votes flipping. I remember people catching this the same day it happened. I’m sure your interested in watching.



Do you recall the fact that Fox News got sued over these claims? Furthermore there's at least 1 more law suit against Fox still pending.

Now answer the question. What were the results of the investigations regarding election fraud? What does the final report state regarding the matter? You can go on claiming election fraud until you're blue in the face and having drawn your last breath but it still comes down to...1. What corroborated evidence supporting election fraud claims remains outstanding and uninvestigated?

2. Do you have in your possession corroborated evidence that disproves Mitch McConnell's statement in front of a joint session of Congress that there was no widespread election fraud?

3. If in the unlikely event you do have some corroborated evidence is it sufficient to overturn the results of a national election?
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
You're avoiding the question. Do you think that Merrick Garland would ever find anything in favor of Trump?
You're missing the point. The role of DOJ regardless of who serves as AG is to prosecute crimes in defense of the law. Trump will always be held in high regard by the DOJ and the AG whoever that person might be going forward just as soon as he comes to the realization that as Jack Smith pointed out that we have one set of laws and it applies to all.
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
You're missing the point. The role of DOJ regardless of who serves as AG is to prosecute crimes in defense of the law. Trump will always be held in high regard by the DOJ and the AG whoever that person might be going forward just as soon as he comes to the realization that as Jack Smith pointed out that we have one set of laws and it applies to all.
🤣🤣🤣
IMG_4578.jpeg
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
You're missing the point. The role of DOJ regardless of who serves as AG is to prosecute crimes in defense of the law. Trump will always be held in high regard by the DOJ and the AG whoever that person might be going forward just as soon as he comes to the realization that as Jack Smith pointed out that we have one set of laws and it applies to all.
If that's the case then Merrick Garland should be appointing a special counsel any second now to investigate why the Biden family is receiving millions of dollars through phony shell companies as well as who is paying Hunter hundreds of thousands for his "art."
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Do you recall the fact that Fox News got sued over these claims? Furthermore there's at least 1 more law suit against Fox still pending.

Now answer the question. What were the results of the investigations regarding election fraud? What does the final report state regarding the matter? You can go on claiming election fraud until you're blue in the face and having drawn your last breath but it still comes down to...1. What corroborated evidence supporting election fraud claims remains outstanding and uninvestigated?

2. Do you have in your possession corroborated evidence that disproves Mitch McConnell's statement in front of a joint session of Congress that there was no widespread election fraud?

3. If in the unlikely event you do have some corroborated evidence is it sufficient to overturn the results of a national election?
FOX News got sued over whether Dominion voting machines were rigged as put forth by a number of guests on their network.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member

vantexan

Well-Known Member
There’s always going to be some misdirection or excuse from you guys. Always.
I'm asking a simple question. Do you think a Merrick Garland led DOJ would ever treat Trump fairly? I watched a video of Biden the other day where he said they were going to do whatever is necessary to keep Trump from running again. Which is what Dems have been trying to do for 7 years.
 
Top