oldngray
nowhere special
Political grandstanding. It will get thrown out when challenged in court.
THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD
- Thread starter Wally
- Start date
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Oh well.
BREAKING: HUGE SCALP: Trump Fires Head of FBI Washington Field Office David Sundberg - Cans More Than 20 Heads of FBI Field Offices | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
In a striking move, President Trump has dismissed David Sundberg, the head of the FBI Washington Field Office, marking a significant shift in the agency's leadership amid ongoing investigations. Read more for insights.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Darmark7
Retired 2020. Not my Problem Anymore!
Thanks god Trump is getting rid of the heads of the FBI that couldn’t figure out who brought cocaine into the most secure building in the USA. The same FBI that still hasn’t figured out how to crack the phone of the assassin that tried to take Trump out and the FBI that doesn’t have a clue how many FBI agents were on the ground at the capitol on Jan 6th. The days of DEI FBI are over!
www.thegatewaypundit.com
All Six FBI Executive Assistant Directors and 25 Special Agents in Charge Out at FBI According to FBI Whistleblower | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo
A significant leadership shakeup at the FBI has resulted in the removal of six Executive Assistant Directors and 25 Special Agents in Charge, raising concerns about political influences within the agency. Read more for details.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Last edited:
This just keeps getting better and better! The insanity is out at a record pace.
Trump Orders Federal Workers to Remove Pronouns From Employee Signatures by 5 PM Today.
NEW: Trump Orders Federal Workers to Remove Pronouns From Employee Signatures by 5 PM Today | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
In a striking move, multiple federal agencies have mandated the removal of pronouns from employee email signatures, citing executive orders aimed at restricting diversity initiatives. This directive raises significant questions about the future of workplace inclusivity.
Was our federal government better with the expectation of pronoun announcements in its communications?
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
Is there expectation now? Or is it something only some people do?
Seems like this is just a way to attack others.
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
I guess they like losing….
Yes. Here’s one example:
Sen. Cruz Introduces Bill Blocking the Federal Government from Compelling Pronoun Use that Contradicts Biology | U.S. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and...
www.cruz.senate.gov
“On October 11th, 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a new “Gender Identity Non-Discrimination and Inclusion Policy for Employees and Applicants.” Among many other harmful changes, this policy compelled speech by requiring employees and contractors with HHS to call other employees by their “preferred pronouns,” even if those pronouns do not align with biological reality.”
Darmark7
Retired 2020. Not my Problem Anymore!
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Is Soaring!
The people have spoken and he listened!
Donald Trump's favorability rating is climbing
Some polls have also shown the president gaining ground among groups that have not traditionally voted Republican.
www.newsweek.com
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
You can’t just use their names if you don’t want to use a pronoun?Yes. Here’s one example:
Sen. Cruz Introduces Bill Blocking the Federal Government from Compelling Pronoun Use that Contradicts Biology | U.S. Senator Ted Cruz of Texas
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and...
“On October 11th, 2023, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a new “Gender Identity Non-Discrimination and Inclusion Policy for Employees and Applicants.” Among many other harmful changes, this policy compelled speech by requiring employees and contractors with HHS to call other employees by their “preferred pronouns,” even if those pronouns do not align with biological reality.”
Snowflakes, Jesus.
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
How will this lower the price of eggs?
How will this keep us all safer?
How will this keep us all safer?
No federal employee should have to spend their time and taxpayer dollars figuring out how to communicate without the use of any pronouns due to leftist insanity.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Darmark7
Retired 2020. Not my Problem Anymore!
Can you imagine being an elementary school teacher trying to teach the word “they” as plural to a kid that‘s mom goes by the pronoun “they?” The insanity is funny as 
but even funnier is people that went along with the mental illness and promoted it.
but even funnier is people that went along with the mental illness and promoted it.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
You probably can, but I don’t know why you would disagree with the bill. Why would You want to force someone to do this? If they want to do it I guess that’s fine?
“The legislation would prohibit federal agencies from “forcing” an employee or contractor to use personal pronouns that contradict with an individual’s biological sex.”
Next Day Err
Well-Known Member
Are we all checking in each other’s pants and skirts to make sure they are their proper biological sex?
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
No idea what that means but like I said, I don’t know why you want the federal government to force you to do it if you don’t want to. If you want to put your pronouns on there go for it no one should be forcing anyone imo.
UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
He’s an authoritarian, like the communists.
Which is exactly what we've been saying all along...forcing people to use "preferred" pronouns that don't align with biological sex isn't fair to those uncomfortable with that. Y'all had no problem forcing people to go along or face disciplinary action up to and including termination to support a very small minority. Seemed like it was just a way to attack others.
