Trump Guilty?

[Ou812fu]

I was going to add that but I stopped short on my post. Trump has opened eyes to the elites, politicians, FBI, CIA, Hollywood, news and ect. Love him or hate him he exposed more in 4 years than anyone previously.

It's not just trump. It's the military.

 

[Ou812fu]

They and their guns will stay in their basements, while they touch themselves periodically.

Hell, they couldn't even organize a decent insurrection when their perceived stakes were at the highest.

An insurrection happened January 6. It wasn't the one that the news showed you. Trump was still in office. They made sure that no matter what he wasn't. My understanding is this video wasn't meant for the maga. It was meant for the true insurrctionist. And when they chose not to go home. The military officially took over. Prove me wrong. Please..

 

[UnionStrong]

Then he will win on appeal.

Yes

 

[vantexan]

Can you?

No, I can't because to my knowledge no one individual has ever been penalized that much. It's excessive and a violation of the 8th Amendment.

 

[Box Ox]

The judge wouldn't allow anyone else to point out what the law says. The jury had to rely only on his instructions.

Isn't that his job?

Not to violate what the Constitution says and the Supreme Court has already ruled on in his instructions.

Then he will win on appeal.

Not in time for the November election. The whole point of this exercise was to make it Biden versus the multiple count felon. Well, maybe it was for the lulz too. Trump is the left's most hated man.

 

[Brown Circus]

View attachment 486361

Tera Ried

 

[Brown Circus]

12 of his peers saw otherwise
Were they all plants?
Could they all be wrong 34 times

12 of his peers my ass! 95% of that county voted against him. Should Biden’s ass be dragged into Texas court and tried for the deaths of soldiers and civilians in the Afghanistan pull out? Or for hooking his son up with millions through Ukraine and China? Or for financing the Attacks on Israel?

 

[Brown Circus]

They and their guns will stay in their basements, while they touch themselves periodically.

Hell, they couldn't even organize a decent insurrection when their perceived stakes were at the highest.

The left is the only ones who see people walking around in the capital as an insurrection. The first time Trump was elected the riots were way worse and Madonna was calling for the White House to be blown up!

 

[oldngray]

Not in time for the November election. The whole point of this exercise was to make it Biden versus the multiple count felon. Well, maybe it was for the lulz too. Trump is the left's most hated man.

If he has to the normal appeal process it will easily be after the election. Which is why he should try to appeal directly to the Supreme Court. He does have Constitutional grounds to do so.

Election interference by Dems?

 

[Pullman Brown]

No, I can't because to my knowledge no one individual has ever been penalized that much. It's excessive and a violation of the 8th Amendment.

That was the obvious irony and comedy in the question being asked….

 

[Pullman Brown]

12 of his peers my ass! 95% of that county voted against him. Should Biden’s ass be dragged into Texas court and tried for the deaths of soldiers and civilians in the Afghanistan pull out? Or for hooking his son up with millions through Ukraine and China? Or for financing the Attacks on Israel?

Again the judge gave money against him in 2020 give me a break.

 

[Box Ox]

If he has to the normal appeal process it will easily be after the election. Which is why he should try to appeal directly to the Supreme Court. He does have Constitutional grounds to do so.

Election interference by Dems?

So far I have to think so because no one has been able to tell me what evidence elevated otherwise past the statute of limitations misdemeanor falsification of business records charges to felonies. No felonies, no trial.

 

[oldngray]

So far I have to think so because no one has been able to tell me what evidence elevated otherwise past the statute of limitations misdemeanor falsification of business records charges to felonies. No felonies, no trial.

An honest judge would have thrown the case out from the start.

 

[Bubblehead]

 

[Sportello]

Again the judge gave money against him in 2020 give me a break.

How much did he give? Did he get approval before he donated?

 

[sailfish]

Imagine being so obsessed with Trump that you post artwork of Trump naked spreading his butt cheeks. The artist even went as far as to illustrate saggy protruding nipples for some reason. They must lay awake fantasizing about all of Trump's specific anatomical details. These people truly are in late-stage mental decay.

 

[rod]

Can you imagine the meltdown when Trump gets elected and pardons himself.

Fixed it for you.

 

[Sportello]

Fixed it for you.

Can’t pardon for state crimes. Try again.

 

[Pullman Brown]

The judge donated money — a tiny amount, $35, but in plain violation of a rule prohibiting New York judges from making political donations of any kind — to a pro-Biden, anti-Trump political operation, including funds that the judge earmarked for “resisting the Republican Party and Donald Trump’s radical right-wing legacy.”

He also did this along with the DA:

So, to inflate the charges up to the lowest-level felony (Class E, on a scale of Class A through E) — and to electroshock them back to life within the longer felony statute of limitations — the DA alleged that the falsification of business records was committed “with intent to commit another crime.” Here, according to prosecutors, the “another crime” is a New York State election-law violation, which in turn incorporates three separate “unlawful means”: federal campaign crimes, tax crimes, and falsification of still more documents. Inexcusably, the DA refused to specify what those unlawful means actually were — and the judge declined to force them to pony up — until right before closing arguments. So much for the constitutional obligation to provide notice to the defendant of the accusations against him in advance of trial. (This, folks, is what indictments are for.)

Ellie Honig

 

[Sportello]

The judge donated money — a tiny amount, $35, but in plain violation of a rule prohibiting New York judges from making political donations of any kind — to a pro-Biden, anti-Trump political operation, including funds that the judge earmarked for “resisting the Republican Party and Donald Trump’s radical right-wing legacy.”

He also did this along with the DA:

So, to inflate the charges up to the lowest-level felony (Class E, on a scale of Class A through E) — and to electroshock them back to life within the longer felony statute of limitations — the DA alleged that the falsification of business records was committed “with intent to commit another crime.” Here, according to prosecutors, the “another crime” is a New York State election-law violation, which in turn incorporates three separate “unlawful means”: federal campaign crimes, tax crimes, and falsification of still more documents. Inexcusably, the DA refused to specify what those unlawful means actually were — and the judge declined to force them to pony up — until right before closing arguments. So much for the constitutional obligation to provide notice to the defendant of the accusations against him in advance of trial. (This, folks, is what indictments are for.)

Ellie <sic> Honig

Did the judge ask permission before buying a tee shirt?

I’ll save you the clicks, he did.

Is Eli Honig some sort of expert, or a propagandist?