rod
Retired 23 years
I don't know what the solution is. It makes me sick thinking about the pension.
I was that way for awhile but now realize we will be ok without it. Its a

I don't know what the solution is. It makes me sick thinking about the pension.
I don't want to retire and have to go get another job just to scrape by.I was that way for awhile but now realize we will be ok without it. Its aty deal all around.
I was that way for awhile but now realize we will be ok without it. Its aty deal all around.
UPS will want to do something - throwing more good money into a failing fund isn't in their long term plan I'm sure.I don't want to retire and have to go get another job just to scrape by.
Right now they are paying $502 a week into our plan and we are only seeing pennies on the dollar. Plus part of my raise goes into the pension. I would rather have that in my 401kOne of our pre 2008 retirees had a good way of looking at it. He said he would have gotten 50% for the 20 years he might still live or 100% for the 10yrs CS has left to survive. Same difference he thought.
UPS will want to do something - throwing more good money into a failing fund isn't in their long term plan I'm sure.
One of our pre 2008 retirees had a good way of looking at it. He said he would have gotten 50% for the 20 years he might still live or 100% for the 10yrs CS has left to survive. Same difference he thought.
UPS will want to do something - throwing more good money into a failing fund isn't in their long term plan I'm sure.
The Treasury Dept required the make whole agreement when UPS exited the fund so that when CS failed the PBGC wouldn't be bankrupted.
Can you PM me or post a link to this requirement?
I'll ask again. Do you have any verifiable link to a Public Law/code that requires UPS to provide anything to any pensioner in any plan after the full payment of withdrawal liability is satisfied? Not opinions or interpretations, just the law.I was always looking for outside sources to verify the make whole promise. It's hard for me to go back and find everything I've read in the last 10yrs but here is an excerpt from a congressional hearing.
But the buyout had to be approved and under ERISA laws at the time, the earned pension amounts had to be guaranteed so I'm sure the PBGC, DOL, or Treasury Dept made the make whole agreement a stipulation in the pension buyout.
------------------------------------------------------------
I'll ask again. Do you have any verifiable link to a Public Law/code that requires UPS to provide anything to any pensioner in any plan after the full payment of withdrawal liability is satisfied? Not opinions or interpretations, just the law.
And you know uncredited excerpts from a Congressional hearings are not even close to law.
Took me awhile to find the law....thanks for the nudge. This part of the ERISA law is for plans in critical status and the remedies within a recovery plan.
29 U.S. Code § 1085 - Additional funding rules for multiemployer plans in endangered status or critical status
View attachment 115112
please note the word AND. It does need to be in the CBA (contrary to what I thought) but it cannot be removed by either UPS or the Teamsters until the original fund that's in critical status (CS), exits the recovery plan and is healthy enough to pay the benefits from the employees service credit in that fund.
Had a part timer retire here awhile back, he claimed his pension check was being paid by an annuity company.Would p/t in the Southern who are already retired, or retiring in the next few years be affected by any potential pension cuts?
Was he an old PT sup? Former PT sup from 40 years ago and then went driving told me his PT years would be paid as an annuity.Had a part timer retire here awhile back, he claimed his pension check was being paid by an annuity company.
No , just an hourly . I need to look him up and ask him what name is on his pension deposit.Was he an old PT sup? Former PT sup from 40 years ago and then went driving told me his PT years would be paid as an annuity.
I am 51 and I will be at UPS 30 years this year, I spent 19 years part time and 11 fulltime when I went 22:3. Realistically my goal is to work 10 more years and retire at 60. However My question is If I am just wondering if I am forced to retire early due to heath conditions (Physical or Internal) Will I be able to, I am pretty sure I would be able to at age 55 if I had to but what about 50-55 and How would it work with my 19 years partime and current 11 years fulltime,
He enjoys that sexy Onroad he has......I think he still enjoys his job. Scratch is not a miserable person.
Just just give plasma and sperm a couple times a month... Make a few thousand extra bucks...they say that uber is the ultimate side hustle, well actually plasma/sperm donation is the ultimate in side hustle.I don't want to retire and have to go get another job just to scrape by.
Just just give plasma and sperm a couple times a month... Make a few thousand extra bucks...they say that uber is the ultimate side hustle, well actually plasma/sperm donation is the ultimate in side hustle.
Those options aren't available. Nobody pays for blood around here unless you drive 100+ miles one way to Minneapolis and as far as sperm goes you end up paying to donate it. Its called last call and some skank at the local saloon.
I don't want to retire and have to go get another job just to scrape by.