If Kavanaugh doesn't get the job, then the President should just nominate a Conservative woman next. How would Democrats handle that? I think he is waiting for Ginsberg to kick the bucket, but she keeps breathing somehow.
I'm pretty sure that you believe all the stupidim sure the guy i quoted wasnt wrong.
Not one whiff of corruption in a long career until he was nominated to the Supreme Court and Dems feared the right to abort would be taken away. So tell me, who are the corrupt ones here, a guy who worked hard all of his life to do things the right way, or a bunch of politicians who are willing to destroy his reputation to please their liberal constituents to save their jobs in the next election?maybe your right.
one thing i do know: a corrupt judge will get a position in the supreme court.
That's like 8th grade level Civics knowledge and extremely common knowledge.No, even if the committee didn't approve him, he would still get a yea or nay vote from the main body if McConnell chose to put it before them.
I watched Jay Leno for many years ask what should've been extremely easy to answer, common knowledge questions on the streets. It's absolutely amazing the lack of knowledge out there. And I'm sure most of those people are competent at what they do but seem to have no interest in learning beyond their little bubble. In Ricky's case he seems only interested in what will tear down America and capitalism, and thus is easily led.That's like 8th grade level Civics knowledge and extremely common knowledge.
Ricky's ignorance in his posts is why I have him on Ignore.
It's basically trash and just wastes my time and he clutters up the page with his lack of ability to post Tweets.I watched Jay Leno for many years ask what should've been extremely easy to answer, common knowledge questions on the streets. It's absolutely amazing the lack of knowledge out there. And I'm sure most of those people are competent at what they do but seem to have no interest in learning beyond their little bubble. In Ricky's case he seems only interested in what will tear down America and capitalism, and thus is easily led.
This observation from you is thoroughly laughable. A person is terrible because they have a different philosophy, or believe differently than you? I thought your crew were the folks pushing "diversity."There are an inordinate amount of really terrible people on this board.
No evidence, no witnesses, no corroboration,, I tend to believe any innocent citizen would be PO'd. Maybe it's just me.I thought he was belligerent and for good reason.
He should have been belligerent to those slimy-assed Dim Senators.
They should all go to hell for what they have done.
All these made up BS stories about him ... SMH.
I agreed with your post, I do think it's highly doubtful your thinking has evolved that far however. I do like your sentiment though.Graham’s speech was epic. I loved it. It was exactly what was in my head put into words in perfection
Obvious what you meant but I've learned to use 'POed' instead ofNo evidence, no witnesses, no corroboration,, I tend to believe any innocent citizen would be. Maybe it's just me.
Any rational citizen ... it's so obvious that this is just political machinations.No evidence, no witnesses, no corroboration,, I tend to believe any innocent citizen would be PO'd. Maybe it's just me.
Taking it one level deeper, the Dims are Liberals who want to change the Constitution so the US citizens are governed in the manner of the Western European Socialist Democracies.Not one whiff of corruption in a long career until he was nominated to the Supreme Court and Dems feared the right to abort would be taken away. So tell me, who are the corrupt ones here, a guy who worked hard all of his life to do things the right way, or
a bunch of politicians who are willing to destroy his reputation to please their liberal constituents
to save their jobs in the next election?
I actually did edit it and made it PO'd, while in time out. Obviously my edited post did not go through. Funny games?Obvious what you meant but I've learned to use 'POed' instead ofiss:ed Off.
Bravo, you displayed great analysis, and foresight. We are currently in a civil war, that is increasingly becoming more uncivil.Taking it one level deeper, the Dims are Liberals who want to change the Constitution so the US citizens are governed in the manner of the Western European Socialist Democracies.
They know they cannot do this through legislation so they want to control the
US Federal Courts (District, Appeals and Supreme) so their Activist Judges creates laws in the courts.
Listen buster, stop denigrating old farts.It's basically trash and just wastes my time and he clutters up the page with his lack of ability to post Tweets.
Of course, I am a grouchy old fart and that factors in as well.
I don't like people wasting my time with stupid.
I believe that is in the plan.If Kavanaugh doesn't get the job, then the President should just nominate a Conservative woman next. How would Democrats handle that? I think he is waiting for Ginsberg to kick the bucket, but she keeps breathing somehow.
Yes. “Rational thinking people.” In current events. Right.You're just mad because she is as radical and goofy as her Dim counterparts.
Just so you know, this is how rational thinking people view the left.
This is just normal for y'all.
The problem with Amy was some republicans favor stare decisis when it comes to Roe. You got idiots like Susan Collins who supported partial birth abortion, literally killing a baby as it comes out, who would vote against her if they got put to flame on abortion.If Kavanaugh doesn't get the job, then the President should just nominate a Conservative woman next. How would Democrats handle that? I think he is waiting for Ginsberg to kick the bucket, but she keeps breathing somehow.
It's basically trash and just wastes my time and he clutters up the page with his lack of ability to post Tweets.
Of course, I am a grouchy old fart and that factors in as well.
I don't like people wasting my time with stupid.