RTURNSONLY
Well-Known Member
Mucho very interesting...
[video]http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/11/01/51870.htm[/video]
[video]http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/11/01/51870.htm[/video]
If all that is true then I'm extremely glad I'm at Express, such as it is.
Wow. If I thought any of that were true, I'd hate working here.
You know better than that. There have been alot of law firms who have seen the same thing, went forward and lost.A law firm thought there was enough truth to go forward with a lawsuit.
You know better than that. There have been alot of law firms who have seen the same thing, went forward and lost.
None of the above has been my experience. And remember, the threshold is not lack of control but degree.
So none of it is true if you haven't experienced it? I've heard a lot about "the Chicago way" in the last 4 years. Think it's possible some bad eggs overstepped their bounds?
Of course it's possible. In eight to ten years we should hear what the court says. .
Probably not. Lets assume for the sake of argument what he claims is true. He is deep in the hole financially and dragging his family down with him. FedEx lawyers know this and most likely will make it clear they plan to drag it out as long as they can unless he signs a nondisclosure agreement. It's a common corporate tactic.
"We will vigorously defend our position in a court of law....FedEx Legal
Of course it's possible. In eight to ten years we should hear what the court says. But the suit seems to suggest systematic, widespread abuse. That would need even more plaintiffs.
Show us the stats.And they win more than they lose.
Why did FedEx go to the ISP model? Because they knew what they were doing wouldn't hold up in court. The ISP is the culmination of trial and error(no pun intended). But you have to figure some got chewed up in the process, and if some Ground mgrs acted inappropriately then some contractors may have a basis for a suit. Charging the company with racketeering under the RICO act sounds like grandstanding but some of it sounds very possible.