I don't have to do anything to discredit you. You do a fine job of it yourself. You have no idea how and why the audience was selected unless you were there when it was selected. Your hypothesis is very demeaning to the minorities that are in the audience.Anything to discredit me, huh? My point is that FedEx is carefully adjusting the "audience" to show how absolutely culturally diverse and wonderful they are. It's completely phony, just like the Diversity Appeal publication. It's all about appearances and "selling" the idea that FedEx embraces diversity. Numerous lawsuits say otherwise.
I'm Caucasian, but my wife is not and neither are my kids. Is your household that diverse? Stick your "xenophobic" tag where it belongs. Make sure it doesn't get jammed up there, OK? What an absolute jerk.
Each one of us deals with the consequences of upper managements decisions and actions on a daily basis. We are part of what happens and generally have a basis of fact to support our position of whether or not things are good or bad. You have absolutely no basis of fact or credible evidence to support your theory that the people in the audience were plants. Without credible evidence, when you just throw crap at the wall to see what sticks, you lower your credibility. You didn't even need to bring the race issue up to make your point so the fact that you did speaks volumes about you. Just because your wife and kids are not Caucasian doesn't mean you don't have a bias.
Again, very demeaning to those people in the audience. I'm sure they'd be more than a little upset that you just see them as "the token Black" or "the token Asian", especially when you really don't have any evidence to support that.You missed the point, which is that this is a completely artificial "audience". While you're ironing your robe and hood for tonight's ride through Shelby County, consider how utterly fake this production will seem to you when you actually view it. You're making commentary on something you know nothing about, which is very typical behavior.
And as usual you resort to ad hominem arguements. However, to quote you "You're making commentary on something you know nothing about" as in you know nothing about how the audience was selected. I know you think you do but you don't. The reason I can be sure of this is that you wouldn't be criticizing the makeup of the audience if you personally selected it. As you are criticizing it, you must not have been part of the selection process and therefore you don't know how it was selected.