ok it sounds like your partly right but heres another quote from wikipediaYou have to understand the difference between "supporting it" and not being able to stop it. Clinton won some small concessions from the republicans in congress when it went to final vote, but that was all he had to contribute to it.
We can argue all day , whether or not it was politically correct for Clinton to have gone to the mat and tried to stop it, but in those days, it would have been horrible optics at the time.
The republicans got what they tried to get during Reagans term, but couldnt get the votes to pass. NAFTA started with the reagan republicans, but never made it out of committee.
BUSH 1 NEGOTIATED, SIGNED and PUSHED NAFTA and left it SIGNED on the desk of Bill Clinton.
Thats history. Everything else is just bullcrap.
TOS.
"
After much consideration and emotional discussion, the House of Representatives passed the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act on November 17, 1993, 234-200. The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. The bill passed the Senate on November 20, 1993, 61-38.[6] Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats. Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993; the agreement went into effect on January 1, 1994"
and judging by all the criticism i hear of clinton about NAFTA, and the fact that he openly supported NAFTA, hes a guilty party.