Hilary Clinton

rickyb

Well-Known Member
You have to understand the difference between "supporting it" and not being able to stop it. Clinton won some small concessions from the republicans in congress when it went to final vote, but that was all he had to contribute to it.

We can argue all day , whether or not it was politically correct for Clinton to have gone to the mat and tried to stop it, but in those days, it would have been horrible optics at the time.

The republicans got what they tried to get during Reagans term, but couldnt get the votes to pass. NAFTA started with the reagan republicans, but never made it out of committee.

BUSH 1 NEGOTIATED, SIGNED and PUSHED NAFTA and left it SIGNED on the desk of Bill Clinton.

Thats history. Everything else is just bullcrap.

TOS.
ok it sounds like your partly right but heres another quote from wikipedia

"
After much consideration and emotional discussion, the House of Representatives passed the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act on November 17, 1993, 234-200. The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. The bill passed the Senate on November 20, 1993, 61-38.[6] Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats. Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993; the agreement went into effect on January 1, 1994"

and judging by all the criticism i hear of clinton about NAFTA, and the fact that he openly supported NAFTA, hes a guilty party.
 

The Other Side

Well-Known Troll
Troll
ok it sounds like your partly right but heres another quote from wikipedia

"
After much consideration and emotional discussion, the House of Representatives passed the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act on November 17, 1993, 234-200. The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. The bill passed the Senate on November 20, 1993, 61-38.[6] Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats. Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993; the agreement went into effect on January 1, 1994"

and judging by all the criticism i hear of clinton about NAFTA, and the fact that he openly supported NAFTA, hes a guilty party.


By guilt, if you mean he signed it, yes. But the act itself was created under the Reagan administration but couldnt get pass committee for a vote, then brought up again during the BUSH1 administration and negotiated, signed and sent to congress for approval.

Clinton wasnt in office during this whole process.

Please try paying attention to detail.

North American Free Trade Agreement Signing | Video | C-SPAN.org

TOS.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
By guilt, if you mean he signed it, yes. But the act itself was created under the Reagan administration but couldnt get pass committee for a vote, then brought up again during the BUSH1 administration and negotiated, signed and sent to congress for approval.

Clinton wasnt in office during this whole process.

Please try paying attention to detail.

North American Free Trade Agreement Signing | Video | C-SPAN.org

TOS.
sure alot of it happened before clinton went into office i agree, but he still signed it and supported it so hes guilty as well. clinton is a corporate crony, and this is just one example. i can go on if youd like.
 

moreluck

golden ticket member
180444.png
 

realbrown1

Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
By guilt, if you mean he signed it, yes. But the act itself was created under the Reagan administration but couldnt get pass committee for a vote, then brought up again during the BUSH1 administration and negotiated, signed and sent to congress for approval.

Clinton wasnt in office during this whole process.

Please try paying attention to detail.

North American Free Trade Agreement Signing | Video | C-SPAN.org

TOS.
OMG, get over it.

Your boy BILLY CLINTON signed it into law.

It doesn't matter what previous presidents did or didn't do.

Because Bill Clinton had a choice.

And he chose to make NAFTA law.

He did that.
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
And now the other shoe drops............

Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails | OilPrice.com

Reliable intelligence sources in the West have indicated that warnings had been received that the Russian Government could in the near future release the text of email messages intercepted from U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server from the time she was U.S. Secretary of State. The release would, the messaging indicated, prove that Secretary Clinton had, in fact, laid open U.S. secrets to foreign interception by putting highly-classified Government reports onto a private server in violation of U.S. law, and that, as suspected, the server had been targeted and hacked by foreign intelligence services.
 
And now the other shoe drops............

Russia Is Reportedly Set To Release Clinton's Intercepted Emails | OilPrice.com

Reliable intelligence sources in the West have indicated that warnings had been received that the Russian Government could in the near future release the text of email messages intercepted from U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server from the time she was U.S. Secretary of State. The release would, the messaging indicated, prove that Secretary Clinton had, in fact, laid open U.S. secrets to foreign interception by putting highly-classified Government reports onto a private server in violation of U.S. law, and that, as suspected, the server had been targeted and hacked by foreign intelligence services.
Good...expose her.
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
Top