realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
Then why do you post?Sometimes it is better to not speak so as to not remove all doubt.
Then why do you post?Sometimes it is better to not speak so as to not remove all doubt.
Read history much?If the founding fathers gave us individual freedoms, then why does a woman have to fight for her right to choose & a same sex couple the right to marry?
check out quora.com ( questions about our military strength )to find out about military strength. we have 11 aircraft carriers. more than the rest of the world combined. thats just one example. sure china has more boots on the ground but they dont have the equipment to support those troops.I disagree with global warming being a threat, or even being real.
Our military may be the best, or may not.
As a vet, I think I can make that call.
We are for sure not the largest military.
And I have no clue to how China has advanced in technology wise since they have all the factories that make everything now.
check out quora.com ( questions about our military strength )to find out about military strength. we have 11 aircraft carriers. more than the rest of the world combined. thats just one example. sure china has more boots on the ground but they dont have the equipment to support those troops.
its astounding to see how much strength the US military has.
check out our Navy for example. no one comes close. we rule the oceans.
i could go on and on.
"for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." ( Newtons Law )Military wasn't the issue. It was how unimportant global warming is and whether man is to blame (still merely an unproven theory which is looking weaker all the time as more real facts emerge).
The US easily has the best navy and Air Force. I would not want to get involved in a land war in Asia though.
Because she's the financial chairwoman of the world's biggest reserve and markets run on money? Not to mention I dare you to tell me the markets wouldn't pause if Obama gave a speech all of a sudden on Syria tomorrow.THE CHAIRMAN OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD. Don't believe me? Then why does every financial market in the world stops dead in it's tracks when the chairman steps up to the mic.
And air power has never held 1 inch of enemy territory without ground troops.check out quora.com ( questions about our military strength )to find out about military strength. we have 11 aircraft carriers. more than the rest of the world combined. thats just one example. sure china has more boots on the ground but they dont have the equipment to support those troops.
its astounding to see how much strength the US military has.
check out our Navy for example. no one comes close. we rule the oceans.
i could go on and on.
We were a part of a UN force, our homeland was not being attacked. Do you think we would react the same to a Chinese act of war on the US?And air power has never held 1 inch of enemy territory without ground troops.
We also had the world's best air and sea power when China sent a million man army into Korea.
Almost shoved us right into the sea.
Our military may be the best, or may not.
As a vet, I think I can make that call.
We are for sure not the largest military.
And I have no clue to how China has advanced in technology wise since they have all the factories that make everything now.
By your own link, I stand correct.We were a part of a UN force, our homeland was not being attacked. Do you think we would react the same to a Chinese act of war on the US?
I think you can't.
The streak continues:
http://www.globalfirepower.com/
Why would we need to occupy enemy territory?And air power has never held 1 inch of enemy territory without ground troops.
We also had the world's best air and sea power when China sent a million man army into Korea.
Almost shoved us right into the sea.
Unless you drop nukes, to beat the enemy, you must conquer their land.Why would we need to occupy enemy territory?
Which "enemy" land do you foresee us needing to "conquer"?Unless you drop nukes, to beat the enemy, you must conquer their land.
Whoever attacks us or 1 of our allies.Which "enemy" land do you foresee us needing to "conquer"?
They have over a billion more people than the US.By your own link, I stand correct.
By your own link, you are wrong.
How embarrassing for you.
China active manpower: 2,333,000
USA active manpower: 1,400,000
Didn't bother to read your own link?
I won't if you won't!
What's embarrassing is your reading comprehension.
All I posted was that I thought Sanders did the best in the debate.
The rest your ranting is just dribble.