77 Million Americans Voted For Socialism and Subservience To China

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
Some people will fall for anything! SMH

Snopes

Did Sarah Palin Say: ‘I Can See Russia from My House’?

2008 GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin did not say 'I can see Russia from my house.'

That line originated with an SNL spoof.

Paradoxically, one of the common features of catch phrases associated with famous figures (both real and fictional) is that those phrases are often caricatures that do not reflect statements actually made by the people with whom they’re associated. For years, impersonators merely had to utter the lines “Judy, Judy, Judy” or “Come with me to the Casbah,” and listeners immediately knew they were portraying actors Cary Grant and Charles Boyer, respectively, though neither man ever delivered such a line in any of his roles. Likewise, the phrase most indelibly associated with the fictional character of Sherlock Holmes, “Elementary, my dear Watson,” appeared in none of the original works authored by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.

So it is that one of the quotes most strongly associated with former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin is the exclamation “I can see Russia from my house!” even though she didn’t actually utter that phrase during the campaign.


Good lord. Just enjoy the clip.
She was a joke of a candidate.
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
You think the lawsuits are going to overturn the election? That Trump and his team have turned up millions of illegal ballots? C’mon man. Fat lady done sung already.
No, I don't.
I think there needs to be some reconciliation done so that half-of-America does not think the election was rigged.
The software used in over 50% of the states was rejected in other states as unreliable.
To that end, I am glad Georgia, one of those states where the questionable software was used, is doing a hand recount in which I hope and expect the software results are affirmed.
 
Last edited:

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
No, I don't.
I think there needs to be some reconciliation done so that half-of-America does not think the election was rigged.
The software used in over 50% of the states was rejected in other states as unreliable.
To that end, I am glad Georgia is doing a hand recount in which I hope and expect the software results are affirmed.
But it’s in Trump’s selfish interest to keep those wild claims alive. He won’t ever let his supporters believe anything other than that. Because contrary to your assumption, facts don’t matter and they have proven that time and time again.
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
So where am I factually wrong. Be specific, with evidence. Unlike Trump in his lawsuits.
You replied to my post where I asserted that Tina did not quote Sarah word for word in all instances, with a side by side comparison that did not contain the phrase, "You can see Russia from my house".
That was an inappropriate and essentially incorrect reply to my statement that Sarah never said that phrase,
which is the most famous/well-known phrase that Tina used as a caricature of Sarah.
 

UPSER1987

Well-Known Member
But it’s in Trump’s selfish interest to keep those wild claims alive. He won’t ever let his supporters believe anything other than that. Because contrary to your assumption, facts don’t matter and they have proven that time and time again.
This guys a chump voter you are arguing with...the uneducated ones lol
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
But it’s in Trump’s selfish interest to keep those wild claims alive. He won’t ever let his supporters believe anything other than that. Because contrary to your assumption, facts don’t matter and they have proven that time and time again.
So?
Goes the same for Biden and his rabid supporters (maybe better characterized as Trump Haters) that deny that Hunter and Biden's brother illegally used influence through Joe Biden's position as Vice-president.

As for the legal objections filed by Trump's campaign, it's not a big deal ... happens all the time and Biden had hundreds of lawyers positioned to object to a Trump win by thin margins. If Trump was ahead, Biden's campaign would be doing the same thing.

We need to get use to this as elections are being won by razor thin margins (<1%) all over the country.

The presidential election is not the only election result that is being challenged across the country by both parties.
 

UPSER1987

Well-Known Member
So?
Goes the same for Biden and his rabid supporters (maybe better characterized as Trump Haters) that deny that Hunter and Biden's brother illegally used influence through Joe Biden's position as Vice-president.

As for the legal objections filed by Trump's campaign, it's not big deal, happens all the time and Biden had hundreds of lawyers positioned to object to a Trump win by thin margins. If Trump was ahead, Biden's campaign would be doing the same thing.

We need to get use to this as elections are being won by razor thin margins all over the country.

The presidential election is not the only election result that is being challenged across the country by both parties.
Take a deep breath...and go to bed old man.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
So?
Goes the same for Biden and his rabid supporters (maybe better characterized as Trump Haters) that deny that Hunter and Biden's brother illegally used influence through Joe Biden's position as Vice-president.

As for the legal objections filed by Trump's campaign, it's not a big deal ... happens all the time and Biden had hundreds of lawyers positioned to object to a Trump win by thin margins. If Trump was ahead, Biden's campaign would be doing the same thing.

We need to get use to this as elections are being won by razor thin margins (<1%) all over the country.

The presidential election is not the only election result that is being challenged across the country by both parties.
So? Well you said that 50% of the electorate needed to be shown that the election was fair. Recounts and audits won’t do that when the current president continues to insist the election was stolen. He continues to insist the the democratic process is itself a hoax.

So why bother continuing with a process that one side simply will not acknowledge?
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
You think the lawsuits are going to overturn the election? That Trump and his team have turned up millions of illegal ballots? C’mon man. Fat lady done sung already.

another fearful response. god you libs are :censored2:ting your pants
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
But it’s in Trump’s selfish interest to keep those wild claims alive. He won’t ever let his supporters believe anything other than that. Because contrary to your assumption, facts don’t matter and they have proven that time and time again.
you libs act like Trump is the first president with selfish interest . Will you drama queens ever stop overstating
 

zimbomb

Well-Known Member
Only an idiot would suggest fraud doesn't occur. I'm sorry you struggle accepting reality fren.
Fraud or attempted fraud is almost guaranteed. Massive fraud that changed an election, lol.
UqSzkHI.jpg
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
So? Well you said that 50% of the electorate needed to be shown that the election was fair. Recounts and audits won’t do that when the current president continues to insist the election was stolen. He continues to insist the the democratic process is itself a hoax.

So why bother continuing with a process that one side simply will not acknowledge?
what are you afraid of?
 
Top