Are we on the brink of civil war 2.0?

[wilberforce15]

If your statement was intended to be a joke, it wasn't funny.

It's a good way to make a point that you don't need to stockpile anything for the apocalypse, except offensive weapons.

 

[Re-Raise]

It's a good way to make a point that you don't need to stockpile anything for the apocalypse, except offensive weapons.

According to your video games?

Are zombies going to be slow or fast?

 

[wilberforce15]

According to your video games?

I don't even own a TV

 

[wilberforce15]

I was just thinking....

If there is any Democrat who really understands that Biden stole this election and engaged in mass fraud, it's Bernie Sanders.

They did it to him twice in primaries.

 

[Macbrother]

And you disagree with Mark Levin, an actual lawyer, because with your own legal expertise, you parsed through each of the 65 cases thoroughly, read each of the judge's legal rendering, and determined for yourself that the cases hadn't been "heard," right?

Suuuuure buddy.

And Robert Barnes. I like how when presented with information that differs from their programming the go to responses are "You're just a dumb truck driver", or holding your level of research to a standard that they themselves would be utterly incapable of achieving, so you must be wrong. I wonder if truck drivers on a forum for truck drivers realize they are disparaging themselves when they call other truck drivers "just a dumb truck driver". The irony escapes them, I think.

Well, it's very simple, actually. I don't know Robert Barnes but I have listened to Mark Levin on numerous occasions so I will focus on him. He's very clearly a right-wing partisan who makes money telling people like the both of you exactly what you want to hear. If he said otherwise, you'd subscribe to someone else. So he has a very vested interest in keeping you tuned in.

Now, let's compare that to the election fraud cases. Are the judges who made those rulings all former left-wing lawyers who now make money telling the left what they want to hear? No. Some are Clinton-appointed, Bush-appointed, Obama-appointed, there's even one Reagan-appointed. A whopping 38 are Trump-appointed. So, judges from across the political spectrum, across five states decisively rejected claims of fraud (such as they were argued) and claims of illegality.

These are lifetime appointments with a salary that is not dependent upon how many viewers they get, nor do they have to worry about next years election cycle. These are by all accounts a neutral arbiter with no vested interest - totally unlike your friend, Mark Levin. So yes, hopefully you'll forgive me when people like Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and ACB roundly rejected your claims about the legality of how PA voted.

 

[Re-Raise]

I don't even own a TV

Oh brother!

I wish you didn’t own a phone

 

[zubenelgenubi]

Well, it's very simple, actually. I don't know Robert Barnes but I have listened to Mark Levin on numerous occasions so I will focus on him. He's very clearly a right-wing partisan who makes money telling people like the both of you exactly what you want to hear. If he said otherwise, you'd subscribe to someone else. So he has a very vested interest in keeping you tuned in.

Now, let's compare that to the election fraud cases. Are the judges who made those rulings all former left-wing lawyers who now make money telling the left what they want to hear? No. Some are Clinton-appointed, Bush-appointed, Obama-appointed, there's even one Reagan-appointed. A whopping 38 are Trump-appointed. So, judges from across the political spectrum, across five states decisively rejected claims of fraud (such as they were argued) and claims of illegality.

These are lifetime appointments with a salary that is not dependent upon how many viewers they get, nor do they have to worry about next years election cycle. These are by all accounts a neutral arbiter with no vested interest - totally unlike your friend, Mark Levin. So yes, hopefully you'll forgive me when people like Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and ACB roundly rejected your claims about the legality of how PA voted.

I literally have no Idea who Mark Levin is outside the context of what has been written in this thread. I forgive you for lying to me about what I think.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Well, it's very simple, actually. I don't know Robert Barnes but I have listened to Mark Levin on numerous occasions so I will focus on him. He's very clearly a right-wing partisan who makes money telling people like the both of you exactly what you want to hear. If he said otherwise, you'd subscribe to someone else. So he has a very vested interest in keeping you tuned in.

Now, let's compare that to the election fraud cases. Are the judges who made those rulings all former left-wing lawyers who now make money telling the left what they want to hear? No. Some are Clinton-appointed, Bush-appointed, Obama-appointed, there's even one Reagan-appointed. A whopping 38 are Trump-appointed. So, judges from across the political spectrum, across five states decisively rejected claims of fraud (such as they were argued) and claims of illegality.

These are lifetime appointments with a salary that is not dependent upon how many viewers they get, nor do they have to worry about next years election cycle. These are by all accounts a neutral arbiter with no vested interest - totally unlike your friend, Mark Levin. So yes, hopefully you'll forgive me when people like Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and ACB roundly rejected your claims about the legality of how PA voted.

You bring up Mark Levin and then rant about election fraud? Mark Levin never made claims of election fraud, he simply pointed out the unconstitutionality of what Democrat lawyers did with election laws before, during, and after the election.

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. As usual.

 

[1989]

Falsifying records is a fireable offense.

Falsifying speech is a job requirement.

Don’t ask. Don’t tell.

 

[MAKAVELI]

Yes, free college, free management positions, free food, and all media and government immediately taking your side....must be tough to be a minority.

Your tears are glorious.

 

[Macbrother]

You bring up Mark Levin and then rant about election fraud? Mark Levin never made claims of election fraud, he simply pointed out the unconstitutionality of what Democrat lawyers did with election laws before, during, and after the election.

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. As usual.

No where in my post did I say Mark Levin made claims of election fraud - but nice try.
What I did point out was why I would trust our entire judiciary branch to know more about what is Constitutional and not, over a right-wing partisan hack with a microphone.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

You bring up Mark Levin and then rant about election fraud?

No where in my post did I say Mark Levin made claims of election fraud

Which is why you post was complete trash.
Ttku leftie.

 

[vantexan]

No where in my post did I say Mark Levin made claims of election fraud - but nice try.
What I did point out was why I would trust our entire judiciary branch to know more about what is Constitutional and not, over a right-wing partisan hack with a microphone.

Levin is a Constitutional scholar who served in the Reagan administration.

 

[Babagounj]

When is this Civil War going to officially start ?
I have my targets already picked out.
I plan on going Democratic Old School.

 

[quad decade guy]

When is this Civil War going to officially start ?
I have my targets already picked out.
I plan on going Democratic Old School.

See you there.

 

[1989]

“I don't need your civil war
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor”

 

[vantexan]

“I don't need your civil war
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor”

"Tax the rich
Feed the poor
Until there are no
Rich no more."