Atheism ON TOPIC

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
Evolution is settled science.

If you want to say, ‘this is how god works’, feel free, but evolution isn’t in play as a thing that may or may not be correct.

Evolution is real, deal with it.
In order to be considered “science,” a phenomenon must be: 1) observable via the senses (albeit we must use tools to enhance our sensory limits frequently); 2) reasonable individuals should be able to posit a theory based upon these observations; and 3) reasonable people should be able to replicate conditions to reproduce the phenomenon in question to either confirm the theory or, more to the point, disprove it, via the scientific method. If these three criteria aren’t met, it isn’t science. Ergo, the Theory of Evolution via Natural Selection cannot be understood as science, but instead, a “leap of faith.”
 

Maple Grove MN Driver

Cocaine Mang!
In order to be considered “science,” a phenomenon must be: 1) observable via the senses (albeit we must use tools to enhance our sensory limits frequently); 2) reasonable individuals should be able to posit a theory based upon these observations; and 3) reasonable people should be able to replicate conditions to reproduce the phenomenon in question to either confirm the theory or, more to the point, disprove it, via the scientific method. If these three criteria aren’t met, it isn’t science. Ergo, the Theory of Evolution via Natural Selection cannot be understood as science, but instead, a “leap of faith.”

Are being obtuse on purpose or are you just dumb?
 

BrownArmy

Well-Known Member
In order to be considered “science,” a phenomenon must be: 1) observable via the senses (albeit we must use tools to enhance our sensory limits frequently); 2) reasonable individuals should be able to posit a theory based upon these observations; and 3) reasonable people should be able to replicate conditions to reproduce the phenomenon in question to either confirm the theory or, more to the point, disprove it, via the scientific method. If these three criteria aren’t met, it isn’t science. Ergo, the Theory of Evolution via Natural Selection cannot be understood as science, but instead, a “leap of faith.”

Wrong.

Where did you copy and paste that from?

Our public education system has obviously failed.
 

Maple Grove MN Driver

Cocaine Mang!
FB_IMG_1563598956552.jpg
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
Wrong. Single cell organisms can form naturally, under the right conditions.
In theory ... no actual occurrence has been observed.
It’s a theory ... God.
Science is a fact based system ... the fact is, no one has observed an inanimate object come to life.
Religion is a faith based system ... the fact is, no one has observed and recorded a supernatural event, but based on faith, that is irrelevant.
Everyone can and will draw their on conclusions on the two systems.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
In order to be considered “science,” a phenomenon must be: 1) observable via the senses (albeit we must use tools to enhance our sensory limits frequently); 2) reasonable individuals should be able to posit a theory based upon these observations; and 3) reasonable people should be able to replicate conditions to reproduce the phenomenon in question to either confirm the theory or, more to the point, disprove it, via the scientific method. If these three criteria aren’t met, it isn’t science. Ergo, the Theory of Evolution via Natural Selection cannot be understood as science, but instead, a “leap of faith.”
1557630110818.jpg
 
Top