Bolton make world go boom boom?

[bbsam]

So if Republicans impeached Obama with the charge of being a n****r that would be constitutional?

Absolutely. But why is everything about race for you?

 

[Boywondr]

Waste of money? Maybe. Would’ve been wasted one way or another.

Welfare mentality right here folks.
Wasted on true dead beats on welfare? At least single mothers of 5 children will get Similac and ADC instead of multimillionaires in cake jobs getting paid to lie.

 

[bbsam]

And how many times has impeachment been used? It was never designed to be used to get rid of political opponents who beat you in an election. All the Dems have done is insured that this will bite them down the road. And when Democrats say out loud they've been working on this for over two years and the misdeed in question occurred last year I don't think they're concerned too much with the Constitution.

And that’s not why it was used this time. And it’s clear republicans have no concern with the constitution whatsoever.

 

[bbsam]

Welfare mentality right here folks.
Wasted on true dead beats on welfare? At least single mothers of 5 children will get Similac and ADC instead of multimillionaires in cake jobs getting paid to lie.

All of that will get wasted as well.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Absolutely.

Wow. I present the dumbest possible hypothetical position and you defend it. Your TDS has rotted your brain.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

It was never designed to be used to get rid of political opponents who beat you in an election.

And that’s not why it was used this time.

That's exactly why it was used this time and Democrats have openly stated that.

 

[bbsam]

Wow. I present the dumbest possible hypothetical position and you defend it. Your TDS has rotted your brain.

Impeachment is the domain of the House. If the decided to impeach based on race, it is their right to do so. What is so hard for you to understand about that?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Impeachment is the domain of the House. If the decided to impeach based on race, it is their right to do so. What is so hard for you to understand about that?

The Constitution specifically lists impeachable offenses. What is so hard for you to understand about that?

 

[El Correcto]

The Constitution specifically lists impeachable offenses. What is so hard for you to understand about that?

Isn’t public entities discriminating based on race a crime?
Federal Protections Against National Origin Discrimination

So wouldn’t them impeaching Obama for being a n* be against the law and get them impeached?

Checkmate fascists.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Looks like Bolton has some bombs to drop.

Nothing burger

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Isn’t public entities discriminating based on race a crime?
Federal Protections Against National Origin Discrimination

So wouldn’t them impeaching Obama for being a n* be against the law and get them impeached?

Checkmate fascists.

No no, Impeachment is whatever they decide it is, the Constitution is just a silly piece of paper.

 

[vantexan]

Of course. The Donald is innocent. Oh. Wait. Nobody is saying that.

Wasn't charged with a crime in the impeachment trial.

 

[Babagounj]

Many question the timing of the " leaked book manuscript ".
The House had every opportunity to subpoena Bolton earlier yet did not bother in their rush to complete the impeachment process before Christmas.
It is the job of the House to investigate and compile the facts before sending the Articles over to the Senate. It is not the job of the Senate to find new " evidence " for the House. The Senate has to vote on the merits of the Articles sent to them. If they are incomplete, then the House should accept that and any outcome that The Senate reaches.

 

[BrownFlush]

Many question the timing of the " leaked book manuscript ".

Why is the timing questioned?
Happens every time .

 

[bbsam]

Many question the timing of the " leaked book manuscript ".
The House had every opportunity to subpoena Bolton earlier yet did not bother in their rush to complete the impeachment process before Christmas.
It is the job of the House to investigate and compile the facts before sending the Articles over to the Senate. It is not the job of the Senate to find new " evidence " for the House. The Senate has to vote on the merits of the Articles sent to them. If they are incomplete, then the House should accept that and any outcome that The Senate reaches.

Seems like the president’s side is nervous. Why? Trump and McConnell have it all worked out. He’s going to be acquitted. What Bolton says doesn’t matter. Whether the Senate hears from him or not, does it matter? Just because it’s not going to “look” fair to the public doesn’t mean anything as long as there exists the technicality.
Again, the president will be acquitted. And the republicans will be left looking like schmucks for defending the president.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

Again, the president will be acquitted. And the republicans will be left looking like schmucks for defending the president.

Again, the president will be acquitted. And the Democrats will be left looking like schmucks for a failed impeachment hoax.

 

[Jkloc420]

Seems like the president’s side is nervous. Why? Trump and McConnell have it all worked out. He’s going to be acquitted. What Bolton says doesn’t matter. Whether the Senate hears from him or not, does it matter? Just because it’s not going to “look” fair to the public doesn’t mean anything as long as there exists the technicality.
Again, the president will be acquitted. And the republicans will be left looking like schmucks for defending the president.

Do ypu think a republucan senator voting against trump will win reelection

 

[It will be fine]

Many question the timing of the " leaked book manuscript ".
The House had every opportunity to subpoena Bolton earlier yet did not bother in their rush to complete the impeachment process before Christmas.
It is the job of the House to investigate and compile the facts before sending the Articles over to the Senate. It is not the job of the Senate to find new " evidence " for the House. The Senate has to vote on the merits of the Articles sent to them. If they are incomplete, then the House should accept that and any outcome that The Senate reaches.

That’s a pathetic excuse for not considering evidence. It only works on the faithful Trump cult members.

 

[Jkloc420]

Seems like the president’s side is nervous. Why? Trump and McConnell have it all worked out. He’s going to be acquitted. What Bolton says doesn’t matter. Whether the Senate hears from him or not, does it matter? Just because it’s not going to “look” fair to the public doesn’t mean anything as long as there exists the technicality.
Again, the president will be acquitted. And the republicans will be left looking like schmucks for defending the president.

obstruction of congress cant even be charged because trump did not get his say in court, it is his right to have a court hear if witnesses can testify

 

[It will be fine]

Do ypu think a republucan senator voting against trump will win reelection

Do you think a swing state Republican senator will win with a vote to cover up evidence?