BigUnionGuy
Got the T-Shirt
Do you have an answer as to why the riders and supplements received renegotiating in 2013, but not this time?
I haven't heard a reason.
Do you have an answer as to why the riders and supplements received renegotiating in 2013, but not this time?
Because in 2013-14, Hoffa was concerned about the politics of getting reelected, now he isn't?Do you have an answer as to why the riders and supplements received renegotiating in 2013, but not this time?
Because in 2013-14, Hoffa was concerned about the politics of getting reelected, now he isn't?
Either way, I don't see how that doesn't demonstrate a precedence that Article 12 of the IBT Constitution is not as rigid as is being advertised today.
~Article 12, Section 6. The General Executive Board is empow- ered to amend, delete, or add to thisArticle if at any time it believes such action will be in the interests of the International Union or its subordinate bodies.~
Maybe you should understand why. The committee recommended a yes then the company backed up on an agreement. Based on that the committee recommended a no. The company came back and honored the deal and the committee then recommended a yes. The issue was short term disability where full time gets 60% of their pay with no cap. The IBT negotiated a cap of $500.I've never seen it broke down like that, but I'm sure the IBT knows.
Flip-flop Fred.... first recommended a yes vote to their supplement (that he
negotiated) then he changed it to vote no, and then back to yes.
And his Local voted down the Rider by 77.46%.
That doesn't say much about his credibility with his members.
It's simple.
The General President is empowered to interpret the IBT constitution....
And he has a majority support of the General Executive Board.
-Bug-
The General President is empowered to interpret the IBT constitution....
And he has a majority support of the General Executive Board.
Let's not forget that federal oversight of the disgusting and corrupt IBT ended in /around 2014.Do you have an answer as to why the riders and supplements received renegotiating in 2013, but not this time?
Salaries yes, pension no....of course he does.
What fool is gonna usurp the General President and risk losing his double, and sometimes triple, dip pension(s)
Was IRB, now is IIO. Little changed.Let's not forget that federal oversight of the disgusting and corrupt IBT ended in /around 2014.
I hope that Big Union person doesn't see this. Oh, wait... lol...of course he does.
What fool is gonna usurp the General President and risk losing his double, and sometimes triple, dip pension(s)
Hoffa hailed the agreement as a "historic day" for the Teamsters' 1.4 million members.
"After decades of hard work and millions of dollars spent, we can finally say that corrupt elements have been driven from the Teamsters and that the government oversight can come to an end," said Hoffa, whose Teamster boss dad is believed to be the victim of a mob hit.
"We have clearly established a culture . . . that no corruption of any kind is tolerated," Hoffa said.
Under the proposal, the Teamsters will have autonomy over election rules and be able to appoint an independent election supervisor provided he or she meets certain standards.
So are you telling us there is no onus for consistency in interpretation?The General President is empowered to interpret the IBT constitution....
And he has a majority support of the General Executive Board.
Thanks CanadaSo are you telling us there is no onus for consistency in interpretation?
....that he has the latitiude to interpret it one way this time, then contradict himself the next???
~Bbbl~™
Because in 2013-14, Hoffa was concerned about the politics of getting reelected, now he isn't?
Either way, I don't see how that doesn't demonstrate a precedence that Article 12 of the IBT Constitution is not as rigid as is being advertised today.
~Article 12, Section 6. The General Executive Board is empow- ered to amend, delete, or add to thisArticle if at any time it believes such action will be in the interests of the International Union or its subordinate bodies.~
So are you telling us there is no onus for consistency in interpretation?
....that he has the latitiude to interpret it one way this time, then contradict himself the next???
~Bbbl~™
Nice dodge.Need some cool wrist bands.
WWFFFD.
What Would friendlip friendlop friendred Do. ?
Nice dodge.
You completely dodged the question.There is no dodge.
Central Region IBT Vice President Bill Frisky from Local 964 sent one....
and his Local approved the contract !