Counterpunch on the 3 Presidential Hopefuls

[wkmac]

OK, being a "Progressive" website, you don't expect to good a treatment for McCain.

https://web.archive.org/web/20110730142246/http://www.counterpunch.org/frank02222008.html

But seems all is not well with Hillary either.

https://web.archive.org/web/20110623060026/http://counterpunch.org/santina04232008.html

So all is glowing for Obama right? Don't be so quick there either.

From 2 years ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20110703194420/http://www.counterpunch.org/cockburn04242006.html


And now a few weeks ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20110805024219/http://www.counterpunch.org/gonzalez02292008.html


Or what about this
https://web.archive.org/web/20110730142246/http://www.counterpunch.org/frank02222008.html

And Counterpunch is by no stretch a rightwing hack website so not all is well for the 2 democrat wrestling wanna be's.


BTW: to Counterpunch for an excellent job IMO on 3 beauty queens.

 

[av8torntn]

"Five top contributors to Obama are registered lobbyists and he fronts for the most vicious players on Wall Street."

LOL