Election Fraud 2023

[Babagounj]

Court Overturns Ganim Win in Bridgeport Primary, Calling Evidence of Fraud 'Shocking'

Haven’t subscribed yet? Click here to register. CT Examiner is just $20 a year. And if you want to unsubscribe? That’s online and at the click of a button. No […]

ctexaminer.com

 

[Box Ox]

Court Overturns Ganim Win in Bridgeport Primary, Calling Evidence of Fraud 'Shocking'

Haven’t subscribed yet? Click here to register. CT Examiner is just $20 a year. And if you want to unsubscribe? That’s online and at the click of a button. No […]

ctexaminer.com

Election fraud cases aren’t a bad thing if there’s actually evidence to support the claims being made.

 

[Babagounj]

Election fraud cases aren’t a bad thing if there’s actually evidence to support the claims being made.

At the witness stand, Ganim told the court he was “shocked” by an 18-minute video – subpoenaed by Gomes from Bridgeport police – that appeared to show 12 instances of Geter-Pataky either depositing stacks of ballots herself or handing ballots to others from behind her reception desk, and four instances of Martinez dropping off ballots.

 

[BrownFlush]

 

[newfie]

 

[Babagounj]

Due to a poorly run USPS, Utah voters mail-in ballots received a late postmark.

Utahns Say Their Votes Were Tossed After Ballots Sent To Vegas

Hundreds of electors in Utah's southwestern counties have come forward claiming their votes weren't counted in the state's June primary.

thefederalist.com

The issue appears to stem from how mail is processed by USPS for these nine Utah counties. According to the local outlet, mail processing for the region “has shifted” from Provo, Utah, to Las Vegas, Nevada, “where it is scanned, barcoded, and postmarked.” Whittaker hypothesized this change and “the maddening 340 mile journey all mail must take to the Vegas sort center and back” produced a situation in which ballots mailed prior to or on June 24 received postmarks after the required deadline.

 

[bottomups]

Due to a poorly run USPS, Utah voters mail-in ballots received a late postmark.

Utahns Say Their Votes Were Tossed After Ballots Sent To Vegas

Hundreds of electors in Utah's southwestern counties have come forward claiming their votes weren't counted in the state's June primary.

thefederalist.com

The issue appears to stem from how mail is processed by USPS for these nine Utah counties. According to the local outlet, mail processing for the region “has shifted” from Provo, Utah, to Las Vegas, Nevada, “where it is scanned, barcoded, and postmarked.” Whittaker hypothesized this change and “the maddening 340 mile journey all mail must take to the Vegas sort center and back” produced a situation in which ballots mailed prior to or on June 24 received postmarks after the required deadline.

I put mine in a drop box along with the hundreds that I harvested.

 

[Wally]

Lancaster County investigating 2,500 voter registrations for possible fraud

The Lancaster County Elections Board said some of the forms contained false names, suspicious handwriting, questionable signatures or incorrect addresses.

whyy.org

 

[bottomups]

Dead are voting for Chump again.

 

[DELACROIX]

View attachment 499485Dead are voting for Chump again.

Easy way to spot a Democrat..they have no sense of humor…

 

[fishtm2001]

there goes that "biased media" again;

ON FRIDAY, after the Washington Post’s publisher announced that the paper was suddenly abandoning the practice of the editorial page endorsing presidential candidates, news leaked that—on the very same day—Donald Trump met with executives from Blue Origin.

Blue Origin, of course, is the rocket company owned by Jeff Bezos, who also owns the Washington Post.

 

[Box Ox]

there goes that "biased media" again;

ON FRIDAY, after the Washington Post’s publisher announced that the paper was suddenly abandoning the practice of the editorial page endorsing presidential candidates, news leaked that—on the very same day—Donald Trump met with executives from Blue Origin.

Blue Origin, of course, is the rocket company owned by Jeff Bezos, who also owns the Washington Post.

Indeed.

Loading…

www.washingtonpost.com

Post columnists respond​

The newspaper’s refusal to endorse a presidential candidate is a mistake.

By 20 Post Opinions columnists
October 25, 2024 at 6:50 p.m. EDT

"The Washington Post’s decision not to make an endorsement in the presidential campaign is a terrible mistake. It represents an abandonment of the fundamental editorial convictions of the newspaper that we love. This is a moment for the institution to be making clear its commitment to democratic values, the rule of law and international alliances, and the threat that Donald Trump poses to them"

 

[Wally]

No doubt.

Loading…

www.washingtonpost.com

Post columnists respond​

The newspaper’s refusal to endorse a presidential candidate is a mistake.

By 20 Post Opinions columnists
October 25, 2024 at 6:50 p.m. EDT

"The Washington Post’s decision not to make an endorsement in the presidential campaign is a terrible mistake. It represents an abandonment of the fundamental editorial convictions of the newspaper that we love. This is a moment for the institution to be making clear its commitment to democratic values, the rule of law and international alliances, and the threat that Donald Trump poses to them"

There is the bias right there. The so-called reporter cannot see how far TDS has infected their thinking.

Do they love "it" (thr WP) for their slant to the left?

 

[fishtm2001]

There is the bias right there. The so-called reporter cannot see how far TDS has infected their thinking.

Do they love "it" (thr WP) for their slant to the left?

"When Bezos decreed that the newspaper he owned could not endorse Trump’s opponent, it was a transparent act of submission borne of an intuitive understanding of the differences between the candidates.

Bezos understood that if he antagonized Kamala Harris and Harris became president, he would face no consequences. A Harris administration would not target his businesses because the Harris administration would—like all presidential administrations not headed by Trump—adhere to the rule of law.'

The Bulwark

 

[fishtm2001]

Obeying in advance

Media billionaires ask for tyranny

snyder.substack.com

 

[Box Ox]

there goes that "biased media" again

Indeed.

Loading…

www.washingtonpost.com

Post columnists respond​

The newspaper’s refusal to endorse a presidential candidate is a mistake.

By 20 Post Opinions columnists
October 25, 2024 at 6:50 p.m. EDT

"The Washington Post’s decision not to make an endorsement in the presidential campaign is a terrible mistake. It represents an abandonment of the fundamental editorial convictions of the newspaper that we love. This is a moment for the institution to be making clear its commitment to democratic values, the rule of law and international alliances, and the threat that Donald Trump poses to them"

There is the bias right there. The so-called reporter cannot see how far TDS has infected their thinking.

Do they love "it" (thr WP) for their slant to the left?

"When Bezos decreed that the newspaper he owned could not endorse Trump’s opponent, it was a transparent act of submission borne of an intuitive understanding of the differences between the candidates.

Bezos understood that if he antagonized Kamala Harris and Harris became president, he would face no consequences. A Harris administration would not target his businesses because the Harris administration would—like all presidential administrations not headed by Trump—adhere to the rule of law.'

The Bulwark

Why all the crying from the WP staff over the boss not letting them officially endorse Kamala if they're not biased?

 

[Ou812fu]

I put mine in a drop box along with the hundreds that I harvested.

I'd be careful what you say about that. There isn't any fish that is to small to fry when it comes to this.

 

[Ou812fu]

"When Bezos decreed that the newspaper he owned could not endorse Trump’s opponent, it was a transparent act of submission borne of an intuitive understanding of the differences between the candidates.

Bezos understood that if he antagonized Kamala Harris and Harris became president, he would face no consequences. A Harris administration would not target his businesses because the Harris administration would—like all presidential administrations not headed by Trump—adhere to the rule of law.'

The Bulwark

The rule of law is to prosecute a person that is running for president? Almost all of the time you throw yourself under the bus. It's a shame how bad our critical thinking skills have gotten.

 

[Box Ox]

there goes that "biased media" again;

ON FRIDAY, after the Washington Post’s publisher announced that the paper was suddenly abandoning the practice of the editorial page endorsing presidential candidates

It seems left-wing bias is what Washington Post subscribers have come to expect too. It's not just their staff.

Loading…

www.cnn.com

More than 250,000 Washington Post readers cancel subscriptions in revolt over non-endorsement​

October 30, 2024

"More than 250,000 Washington Post readers have canceled their subscriptions since the newspaper announced last week it would not make an endorsement in the presidential race, leading to a “huge spike” in cancelations, the Post reported late Tuesday.

The endorsement decision, first announced on Friday by Post publisher Will Lewis, resulted in the newspaper losing roughly 10% of its digital subscribers by Tuesday evening, the paper reported, citing documents and two people familiar with the figures."

 

[bottomups]

I'd be careful what you say about that. There isn't any fish that is to small to fry when it comes to this.

Got away with it the first time so I'm harvesting some more.