FBI Raids Mar-a-lago

newfie

Well-Known Member
Totally incorrect. If anything Comey should’ve followed protocol and kept his mouth shut.

They found nothing criminal on her like always. Because she didn’t commit a crime.
she was in collusion with comey generating the russian collusion insurrection. there was no way he could prosecute her without her blowing the whistle on comey and the others .
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
I’m aware of what they found. What she did was get too careless with the material using the wrong phone for the job with the wrong servers being used on that device. I think she should’ve been fined but she lost the election over it most likely so that’s pretty strong retribution.

It’s happened since then. Look at the news Kushner violated the norms in the same way.
what she did was destroy evidence after recieving a subpoena for that evidence. you can't defend that and at the same time try to hold Trump accountable for acting within his powers as president.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
I know she’s been the target of the right since she was in Arkansas. They never got anything to stick because she’s not a criminal. It’s all misinformation and BS.
she should have been the target of law enforcement for her numerous violations of the espionage act and subsequent cover up
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
what she did was destroy evidence after recieving a subpoena for that evidence. you can't defend that and at the same time try to hold Trump accountable for acting within his powers as president.
Trump would have been arresting if he destroyed subpoenaed evidence, it’s not even disputable. That bitch should have been charged.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Trump better hope like hell they can’t prove unauthorized people have handled these docs. He better hope like hell that Trump’s rats don’t lead them to other crimes related to these materials.
looks like you're conceeding the classification issues and now looking for a consolation prize.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
i'm sure if you were an ex president that you would have documents that you felt belonged to you. thus the debate with every president leaving office.

the fact that none of you libs knew anything about this process from past presidents is typical. Its only an outrage when trump does it .
I, as a liberal, didn’t know about the process because I never tried to defend Hillary or Obama. We as liberals didn’t sign onto a cult where the leader was beyond reproach and needed to be defended and supported up to and including violence upon law enforcement, judges, members of congress and pretty much anyone else who steps out of line.

And I challenge you to find anything I’ve posted on this subject as “outrage”. I think I’ve been pretty levelheaded with this one and summed it up as such:

Who owns the documents? If they are declassified, does that make them Trump’s? Does the US government have a legitimate claim to the documents? What is the normal process and if so was it followed? If not, why not?

Pretty straightforward stuff.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
I, as a liberal, didn’t know about the process because I never tried to defend Hillary or Obama. We as liberals didn’t sign onto a cult where the leader was beyond reproach and needed to be defended and supported up to and including violence upon law enforcement, judges, members of congress and pretty much anyone else who steps out of line.

And I challenge you to find anything I’ve posted on this subject as “outrage”. I think I’ve been pretty levelheaded with this one and summed it up as such:

Who owns the documents? If they are declassified, does that make them Trump’s? Does the US government have a legitimate claim to the documents? What is the normal process and if so was it followed? If not, why not?

Pretty straightforward stuff.
I’m not on either side but your comment is the most ridiculous, I’ve ever seen either you’re completely oblivious or you’re lying.

And you didn’t need to defend Hillary because the deep state did just fine defending her by making it OK everything she did remember all the laws she broke she didn’t do on purpose according to them. Will that be OK if they say that about Trump do you.


As I sit here and listen to each side both sides are a off the mark but you seem to not understand who you actually are. Your cult is just as strong.


Here’s just two examples of your side as you call it liberals looking awful cultish:

 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
You admit you don't care if the FBI leaks

... if it is about Trump
Actually I was agreeing with you that things will likely be leaked. Do I care? Not particularly. Pretty standard stuff. More likely that “the someone” from Trump’s inner circle who tipped off the FBI will leak it to news media first. Some folks like that kind of stuff.
 

oldngray

nowhere special
Actually I was agreeing with you that things will likely be leaked. Do I care? Not particularly. Pretty standard stuff. More likely that “the someone” from Trump’s inner circle who tipped off the FBI will leak it to news media first. Some folks like that kind of stuff.
The FBI has a long history of selective leaks to manipulate the Media. Who are faithful lapdogs.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Actually I was agreeing with you that things will likely be leaked. Do I care? Not particularly. Pretty standard stuff. More likely that “the someone” from Trump’s inner circle who tipped off the FBI will leak it to news media first. Some folks like that kind of stuff.
Listen I like I like talking to you you’re no dummy but pretending your side is not acting like a cult makes you seem disingenuous, You could say I don’t agree with many of the

Actions my side does and I would be fine with that but saying your side doesn’t do the same thing for different reasons is really not true
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
I, as a liberal, didn’t know about the process because I never tried to defend Hillary or Obama. We as liberals didn’t sign onto a cult where the leader was beyond reproach and needed to be defended and supported up to and including violence upon law enforcement, judges, members of congress and pretty much anyone else who steps out of line.

And I challenge you to find anything I’ve posted on this subject as “outrage”. I think I’ve been pretty levelheaded with this one and summed it up as such:

Who owns the documents? If they are declassified, does that make them Trump’s? Does the US government have a legitimate claim to the documents? What is the normal process and if so was it followed? If not, why not?

Pretty straightforward stuff.
Funny stuff. We liberals….Lol. So you speak for all of them?
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
I’m not on either side but your comment is the most ridiculous, I’ve ever seen either you’re completely oblivious or you’re lying.

And you didn’t need to defend Hillary because the deep state did just fine defending her by making it OK everything she did remember all the laws she broke she didn’t do on purpose according to them. Will that be OK if they say that about Trump do you.


As I sit here and listen to each side both sides are a off the mark but you seem to not understand who you actually are. Your cult is just as strong.


Here’s just two examples of your side as you call it liberals looking awful cultish:

Actually, blob…may i call you blob? We have lots of posts here in BC and I’d love to invite you to find my “cultish” posts.

Probably won’t find it on either of the two topics you referenced though. I don’t recall caring that much about either.

And I’ve been quite frank about being wrong about “Russian collusion” on several occasions simply because of it were true, a lot more would have leaked out by now.

But it’s “current events” on BC so have whatever impressions you find appropriate. Believe what you want. I won’t call you unAmerican or a Nazi or anything else that might fall out of MTG’s pie hole.
It’s America. You get to be a weirdo.😀
 
Top