FBI Raids Mar-a-lago

newfie

Well-Known Member
Ok. And that doesn’t make what he said right or wrong, relevant or irrelevant. Simply something to consider in the case at hand.
he was on fox a lot years ago. his expert advice was often proven wrong and probably why he's not there anymore.
 

newfie

Well-Known Member
Or he wasn’t toeing the Fox line
they have two constitutional experts on fox both are liberals and neither voted for trump. They have another liberal that will cover for hannity or laura. more an old school liberal than the new band of crazies . they have quite a few libertarians on fox.
the daytime news is too corporate for me. if i watch any daytime news its usually one of the business channels.

but overall fox is far from the slam dunk republican news source they try to make it out to be.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
they have two constitutional experts on fox both are liberals and neither voted for trump. They have another liberal that will cover for hannity or laura. more an old school liberal than the new band of crazies . they have quite a few libertarians on fox.
the daytime news is too corporate for me. if i watch any daytime news its usually one of the business channels.

but overall fox is far from the slam dunk republican news source they try to make it out to be.
Napolitano is far from a liberal. I’d say more libertarian than anything.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Ummm. Yes he does at about the :50 point. That’s probably the most fascinating point.
Missed that but remains to be seen how this will play out. He's obviously angling towards convicting Trump in the court of public opinion. Wouldn't be the first time for him.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Good to know, Sean.


“Fox News host Sean Hannity said during his radio show Monday that if former President Trump is indicted on any felony charge it would not disqualify him from seeking the presidency again in 2024.

“If they think that they’re going to somehow make this about Donald Trump and prevent him from running from office, well they obviously have not read something called the Constitution. Because the Constitution is pretty clear on what qualifies one to be able to run for president,” Hannity said on his radio program.”




The search receipt listing multiple Top Secret and Secret level document sets indicates to me that the raid wasn’t just some fishing expedition.
Why do people watch this guy anymore? Or listen to him on the radio? SMH
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
Good grief you know I have already told you LOL. But maybe you forgot. he is not intelligent. He talks over people he says the same things over and over again. And he’s wrong a lot… I could be more specific but I’m really not interested in spending a lot of time on him
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Good grief you know I have already told you LOL. But maybe you forgot. he is not intelligent. He talks over people he says the same things over and over again. And he’s wrong a lot… I could be more specific but I’m really not interested in spending a lot of time on him
I agree on a lot of that and think Tucker covers a much greater variety of topics and is more thought provoking. But Hannity has his place. No one supported Trump more. And what turns us off about him might be very appealing to those, especially the elderly, who need to have things repeated. At any rate the guy got super rich doing what he does so doubt he's going to change his formula.
 
Top