Kushner actually worked in investment banking. The real question is how did Hunter Biden's no experience three man firm get $1.5 billion from the Chinese?
How Did Jared Kushner Get $2 Billion From the Saudis?
Hint: It’s not because of his track record as an investor.www.bloomberg.com
FBI Raids Mar-a-lago
- Thread starter zubenelgenubi
- Start date
newfie
Well-Known Member
i dont think he cares for Biden at all.
newfie
Well-Known Member
dont want to post anything about Hunter biden here?How Did Jared Kushner Get $2 Billion From the Saudis?
Hint: It’s not because of his track record as an investor.
PT Car Washer
Well-Known Member
Or ever visited Walter Reed?
newolddude
Well-Known Member
No I figure you’ve got that more than covered.
newolddude
Well-Known Member
newfie
Well-Known Member
thought so
Next Day Error
X - Other
Yesssss yesssss let the cannibalism flow through them
newfie
Well-Known Member
you guys are really tapped into the conspiracy stuff
newolddude
Well-Known Member
Says the guy screaming “FBI conspiracy” over and over.
The timing of the raid is odd. Someone talked.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Well the FBI keeps getting caught.
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
I mean, how many examples do you want... from this year?
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
Newsweek got the go ahead to print what the FBI was actually after. I'm sure they did their best to make it sound bad for Trump anyway.
www.newsweek.com
FBI Sought Documents Trump Hoarded for Years, Including about Russiagate
The Mar-a-Lago search was specifically intended to recover Donald Trump's personal stash of hidden documents—which officials feared he might "weaponize."
www.newsweek.com
Newsweek got the go ahead to print what the FBI was actually after. I'm sure they did their best to make it sound bad for Trump anyway.
FBI Sought Documents Trump Hoarded for Years, Including about Russiagate
The Mar-a-Lago search was specifically intended to recover Donald Trump's personal stash of hidden documents—which officials feared he might "weaponize."
So anonymous people “familiar with the investigation” were talking to Newsweek but couldn’t even give a head nod as to whether nuclear weapons documents were involved. AND nuclear weapons documents were not the main focus of the raid.
If nuclear weapons documents weren’t the main focus of the raid they probably don’t exist. And if they don’t exist the raid of a former President’s home probably wasn’t legit.
Anybody who would vote for Biden again care to argue otherwise?
“The Washington Post reported that those documents dealt with nuclear weapons, adding on Tuesday, "People familiar with the investigation did not offer additional details, such as whether the documents being sought involved weapons belonging to the United States or another nation."
The two U.S. officials with direct knowledge of the situation tell Newsweek that while some of the intelligence documents might have dealt with nuclear weapons, that was not the main focus.”
zubenelgenubi
I'm a star
So anonymous people “familiar with the investigation” were talking to Newsweek but couldn’t even give a head nod as to whether nuclear weapons documents were involved. AND nuclear weapons documents were not the main focus of the raid.
If nuclear weapons documents weren’t the main focus of the raid they probably don’t exist. And if they don’t exist the raid of a former President’s home probably wasn’t legit.
Anybody who would vote for Biden again care to argue otherwise?
“The Washington Post reported that those documents dealt with nuclear weapons, adding on Tuesday, "People familiar with the investigation did not offer additional details, such as whether the documents being sought involved weapons belonging to the United States or another nation."
The two U.S. officials with direct knowledge of the situation tell Newsweek that while some of the intelligence documents might have dealt with nuclear weapons, that was not the main focus.”
It seems to spell it out pretty plainly for a mefia source. They weren't after anything in particular, it was a fishing expedition. They feared Trump had information that he would weaponize against the establishment, so they wanted to recover it. They suggest that Trump would weaponize it in some illegal fashion, but he didn't have to, if the supposed information even existed at all. Trump gave the FBI a great opportunity to discredit themselves and they were overly anxious to jump on it.
DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
That's debatable, but more importantly, doesn't answer the question I asked. Not to mention I wasn't talking to you austin.
oldngray
nowhere special
Old case over audio tapes in Bill Clinton's sock drawer could impact Mar-a-Lago search dispute
Judge ruled in 2012 that a president's discretion to declare records "personal" is far-reaching and mostly unchallengeable.
justthenews.com
Next Day Error
X - Other
It’s not debatable in this case.
Similar threads
