FBI Raids Mar-a-lago

[Jiangshi]

Weird how some of the swing states have decertified the election. But keep telling yourself Biden won.

Which States have decertified the 2020 election?

 

[728ups]

fixed it for you

wow you sure told me

 

[newfie]

There was no voter fraud, and all of the lawsuits failed because of lack of proof. I understand how devastating this can be for the Cult members but understand those of us who arent in the cult are laughing our collective asses off at the Cult for clinging to these beliefs

you admitted there were 60 attempts to have all the evidence heard and no one took it.
this was a golden opportuntiy for the government to take the case and restore confidence in our voting system
it was an opportunity to look at everything that happened and fix or improve on those things that need fixing.
they failed.
failed miserably.

 

[728ups]

delusional. trump declassified those documents to take them with him, to keep for his memoirs to keep for his records.
you libs keep trying to take the extreme argument with this. Your TDS is making you look like Nut jobs.

Please explain to us how documents are declassified.

 

[Next Day Error]

ok so you agree the case and evidence was never heard.

Cases get thrown out because of lack of merit all the time. It was heard, sure, for as long as the judge took to see that the initial claims were stupid. Case closed.

 

[newfie]

Please explain to us how documents are declassified.

i have about three hundred times. you have tried to rebut most of those explanations.

 

[728ups]

prove me wrong . tell me where in what court all the evidence was heard, cross examined and rebutted by both sides. Pal

I;d really love to show you that but your side didnt have enough proof to bring these cases to trial. .They were dismissed because of NO PROOF. They were a waste of the courts time. Sidney Powell even admitted in court "no reasonable person" would take her voter fraud claims as fact

Sidney Powell tells court "no reasonable person" would take her voter fraud claims as fact

Dominion Voting Systems filed a $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit against Powell in January.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[newfie]

I;d really love to show you that but your side didnt have enough proof to bring these cases to trial. .They were dismissed because of NO PROOF. They were a waste of the courts time. Sidney Powell even admitted in court "no reasonable person" would take her voter fraud claims as fact

Sidney Powell tells court "no reasonable person" would take her voter fraud claims as fact

Dominion Voting Systems filed a $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit against Powell in January.

www.cbsnews.com

so you're saying none of the 60 attempted court cases were heard? glad we're finally in agreement.

 

[728ups]

i have about three hundred times. you have tried to rebut most of those explanations.

no you havent,you have said Trump had the authority to do so. You DO realize he isnt a king right? even the president has to follow rules and procedures as was brought up by John Bolton.
He dosent just wave a Magic and Wand and **POOF** they are declassified.again PLEASE tell us the procedure to declassify them? I realize that altering previous posts is more your speed and this very well may be a bridge too far for you

 

[728ups]

so you're saying none of the 60 attempted court cases were heard? glad we're finally in agreement.

yeah they werent heard because there was zero proof. Ya gotta do better than just go to court and tell the judge the Cult leader says this,it must be true.

 

[newfie]

no you havent,you have said Trump had the authority to do so. You DO realize he isnt a king right? even the president has to follow rules and procedures as was brought up by John Bolton.
He dosent just wave a Magic and Wand and **POOF** they are declassified

see the word king is something you make up when you have one of your TDS induced hissy fits.
as I have said many times.
Trump was PRESIDENT and had certain declassification powers that no one else had. period.
and you're right he does not need a magic wand just his say so and its declassified.

 

[newfie]

yeah they werent heard because there was zero proof. Ya gotta do better than just go to court and tell the judge the Cult leader says this,it must be true.

don't know if there was any proof if they never had the chance to present their evidence.
see how the cover up works now?

 

[vantexan]

yeah they werent heard because there was zero proof. Ya gotta do better than just go to court and tell the judge the Cult leader says this,it must be true.

You present proof at trial. The judge doesn't look over everything you have first. The most important case was the one Texas brought and a bunch of other states signed onto. The Supreme Court refused to hear it. It was very clear why the suit was brought. A number of states had violated their state constitutions to change rules that affected the outcome. Texas and others argued that by doing so they negated the vote in other states. SCOTUS with the exception of Alito and Thomas wouldn't touch it. That included the 3 Trump appointees that y'all like to rag on all the time. And with the abortion ruling it's not hard to understand why. The Left had protesters in front of justices' homes making threats and in the case of one almost carrying out the threat. And your high minded Biden administration AG won't prosecute them in spite of it being a clear violation of Federal law.

 

[728ups]

don't know if there was any proof if they never had the chance to present their evidence.
see how the cover up works now?

jesus ,you pitiful Cultists.

 

[728ups]

You present proof at trial. The judge doesn't look over everything you have first. The most important case was the one Texas brought and a bunch of other states signed onto. The Supreme Court refused to hear it. It was very clear why the suit was brought. A number of states had violated their state constitutions to change rules that affected the outcome. Texas and others argued that by doing so they negated the vote in other states. SCOTUS with the exception of Alito and Thomas wouldn't touch it. That included the 3 Trump appointees that y'all like to rag on all the time. And with the abortion ruling it's not hard to understand why. The Left had protesters in front of justices' homes making threats and in the case of one almost carrying out the threat. And your high minded Biden administration AG won't prosecute them in spite of it being a clear violation of Federal law.

Enjoy your delusions.

 

[728ups]

You present proof at trial. The judge doesn't look over everything you have first. The most important case was the one Texas brought and a bunch of other states signed onto. The Supreme Court refused to hear it. It was very clear why the suit was brought. A number of states had violated their state constitutions to change rules that affected the outcome. Texas and others argued that by doing so they negated the vote in other states. SCOTUS with the exception of Alito and Thomas wouldn't touch it. That included the 3 Trump appointees that y'all like to rag on all the time. And with the abortion ruling it's not hard to understand why. The Left had protesters in front of justices' homes making threats and in the case of one almost carrying out the threat. And your high minded Biden administration AG won't prosecute them in spite of it being a clear violation of Federal law.

As far as Texas it was ruled Texas had no standing to bring it,and when it was filed it was viewed as a grasping- at -straws long shot that had no chance .
Legal experts warned that if Texas succeeded, the case would set a dangerous precedent of allowing states to intervene in one another’s affairs — and allowing courts to overturn settled, certified election results.

“Let us be clear,” attorneys for Pennsylvania wrote in the state’s reply brief. “Texas invites this Court to overthrow the votes of the American people and choose the next President of the United States. That Faustian invitation must be firmly rejected.”
Texas’ lawsuit leaned heavily on discredited claims of election fraud in swing states. Election officials and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr have said there is no evidence of election fraud on a scale that could have swayed the results.



Also When one Lawyer admits noone should have taken her seriously over her fraud claims and another admits to getting his 'evidence" of Voter fraud from Social Media it makes it a bit more understandable why these cases were laughed out of court

Rudy Giuliani admits under oath that he got some of his 'evidence' of alleged election fraud from social media

Donald Trump's lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, admitted in a deposition that he didn't interview or fact-check his sources.

www.businessinsider.com

 

[728ups]

 

[Babagounj]

View attachment 397163

Yet he hasn't been accused of taking any showers with an 11 year old girl like the current POTUS has. Nor have any of his children been accused of working for foreign governments. Nor did he spent decades in an elected office doing nothing.

 

[DriveInDriѵeOut]

Sorry you cant grasp this mans experience with Presidents,i really thought even someone of limited intelligence could grasp it . There really were other presidents than Regan and Trump lol

In which of the 60 lawsuits was actual evidence of voter fraud presented?
here's a hint : NONE

and that reflects on his experience how?

Bolton most certainly would be VERY familiar with procedures of how classified documents are handled and his opinion should be taken as fact because ( and i dont mind repeating my self for you Cult members) he has served under other presidents . You Cult members are giving us great entertainment by thinking that Trump waved a magic wand and **POOF** everything is declassified.

The filings certainly were heard, they were dismissed due to no proof of fraud was provided.

Tell us you have absolutely NO clue about how classified information is handled without telling us you are freaking clueless

Right,sure pal.

again,you are entertaining us with your sheer arrogant ignorance.

There was no voter fraud, and all of the lawsuits failed because of lack of proof. I understand how devastating this can be for the Cult members but understand those of us who arent in the cult are laughing our collective asses off at the Cult for clinging to these beliefs

wow you sure told me

Please explain to us how documents are declassified.

I;d really love to show you that but your side didnt have enough proof to bring these cases to trial. .They were dismissed because of NO PROOF. They were a waste of the courts time. Sidney Powell even admitted in court "no reasonable person" would take her voter fraud claims as fact

Sidney Powell tells court "no reasonable person" would take her voter fraud claims as fact

Dominion Voting Systems filed a $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit against Powell in January.

www.cbsnews.com

no you havent,you have said Trump had the authority to do so. You DO realize he isnt a king right? even the president has to follow rules and procedures as was brought up by John Bolton.
He dosent just wave a Magic and Wand and **POOF** they are declassified.again PLEASE tell us the procedure to declassify them? I realize that altering previous posts is more your speed and this very well may be a bridge too far for you

yeah they werent heard because there was zero proof. Ya gotta do better than just go to court and tell the judge the Cult leader says this,it must be true.

jesus ,you pitiful Cultists.

As far as Texas it was ruled Texas had no standing to bring it,and when it was filed it was viewed as a grasping- at -straws long shot that had no chance .
Legal experts warned that if Texas succeeded, the case would set a dangerous precedent of allowing states to intervene in one another’s affairs — and allowing courts to overturn settled, certified election results.

“Let us be clear,” attorneys for Pennsylvania wrote in the state’s reply brief. “Texas invites this Court to overthrow the votes of the American people and choose the next President of the United States. That Faustian invitation must be firmly rejected.”
Texas’ lawsuit leaned heavily on discredited claims of election fraud in swing states. Election officials and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr have said there is no evidence of election fraud on a scale that could have swayed the results.



Also When one Lawyer admits noone should have taken her seriously over her fraud claims and another admits to getting his 'evidence" of Voter fraud from Social Media it makes it a bit more understandable why these cases were laughed out of court

Rudy Giuliani admits under oath that he got some of his 'evidence' of alleged election fraud from social media

Donald Trump's lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, admitted in a deposition that he didn't interview or fact-check his sources.

www.businessinsider.com

View attachment 397163

The bat crazy psychotic ravings of a Trump obsessed nutcase. You need to seek mental health services.

Seriously buddy, you're embarrassing yourself.
I feel sorry for you.

 

[newfie]

jesus ,you pitiful Cultists.

surrender accepted