Football
- Thread starter BMWMC
- Start date
Um, yeah...for Brady, not the Buc's. Damn amazing, love him or hate him.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
He might be one of the greats but not the GOAT! That belongs to Montana! I mean he played a great 1 st half but stunk in the second. He got lucky throwing 3 picks, a missed interference call and a dumb field goal instead of going for it on 4th and goal by the Packers.
Whither
Scofflaw
Already got em once in their house.Yep, first time that a SB team has been the home team...Get ready TB to lose in front of your home crowd to KC.
Back when Brady had 3 or 4 SB wins you could have legitimate arguments about who was the GOAT. Kinda pointless now though. After that comeback win against Atlanta I stopped even talking about it.
Brownslave688
You want a toe? I can get you a toe.
Yeah I’m not sure who could try to make an argument at this point. Dude is 43 years old.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
He got some good drugs.
olroadbeech
Happy Verified UPSer
even if TB loses the SB his legacy is sealed even before this season. can you imagine at age 42 going to a team that hasnt been in playoffs for 13 years , taking to playoffs as a wild card team and going to the SB??
I laugh when they talk about Rogers being the goat. come on clowns. he's 1-4 in championship games.
Brady is 10-4 in championship games against the best teams in history.
no comparison.
I laugh when they talk about Rogers being the goat. come on clowns. he's 1-4 in championship games.
Brady is 10-4 in championship games against the best teams in history.
no comparison.
Wrong "Bay area" dude. But it flows freely in North Cal.lolHe got some good drugs.
Pretty crazy:
www.espn.com
NFL experts debate the Matthew Stafford-Jared Goff trade: Are the Rams legit contenders?
The Los Angeles Rams and Detroit Lions are making a swap of former No. 1 overall draft picks. Our panel tells us what the trade means and what's next.
oldngray
nowhere special
That was a head scratcher.Pretty crazy:
NFL experts debate the Matthew Stafford-Jared Goff trade: Are the Rams legit contenders?
The Los Angeles Rams and Detroit Lions are making a swap of former No. 1 overall draft picks. Our panel tells us what the trade means and what's next.
1989
Well-Known Member
We’re talking about Detroit they’ve had 12 winning seasons since 1970. Where the rams have made it to the playoffs 22 times in the last 52 years. I’m sure the rams know what they are doing. Stafford will thrive in a superior organization.
Is that why they painted themselves into such a corner with Goff's contract that the only way out was to give up 2 first round picks for a 33 year old QB?
oldngray
nowhere special
Stafford might be marginally better now but has a very short shelf life. LA must be betting on winning it all in the next couple of years. Goff may be an inconsistent turnover machine but has far more potential for the future. I can't see Goff willingly gong to Detroit so maybe things going on behind the scenes.
Wilson1397
Half the lies they tell about me aren't true!!
Stat wise they are almost the same QB. I do think Stanford is somewhat better but not 2 first round picks better. I think Goff can do what Stafford did in Detroit but the question is can Stanford do the same. Goff did get them to a Super Bowl.
upschuck
Well-Known Member
As a long suffering Detroit fan, this makes me a happy guy.
oldngray
nowhere special
Definitely an upgrade for Detroit. Stafford is a better passer - when healthy. And a lot less mobile than Goff.
Wilson1397
Half the lies they tell about me aren't true!!
I would be too.......you get a younger QB with the same skills and 2 first round picks.........it’s a no brainer
oldngray
nowhere special
This trade ranks up there with the Houston trading Hopkins to Arizona deal.