Georgia, Georgia Always On My Mind ... Because Georgia Controls US Senate Leadership

vantexan

Well-Known Member
And how much did Warnock have? Collins had over 800,000 votes and came in 3rd. If Loeffler and Collins made up 46% then Warnock got a heck of a lot more votes than last time because he was in second.
OK I'm way off on this. I looked at results before it was over. Warnock got 32% and came in first. But the Republicans split their vote which combined to be 46% as Jingles said. But for the Dems to overcome a huge margin and win really depended on them being more proactive in turning out the vote and Republicans not being motivated enough. Going to discount fraud on this although there may have been just enough to give it to the Democrats. But the kind seen November 3rd probably didn't happen since it was monitored so closely. A lot of Republicans were disgusted with the November election and that may have been enough to keep a lot of them home.
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
Only easily tricked sheep fall for that kind of stupud meaningless fluff speech writing.

Grow up.
What do you imagine red states and blues states is? Nonsense. But in fact we really are the United States of America, he was stating a fact.
All that means is a state leans Republican or Democrat in its voting. If it's close, can go either way, it's called purple or a swing state.
It’s nonsense though. In reality all states would be purple, because there is usually at 35% of voters in any given that supports the candidate that doesn’t win their state in presidential elections. It is a description that paints an utterly false picture of reality.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
What do you imagine red states and blues states is? Nonsense. But in fact we really are the United States of America, he was stating a fact.

It’s nonsense though. In reality all states would be purple, because there is usually at 35% of voters in any given that supports the candidate that doesn’t win their state in presidential elections. It is a description that paints an utterly false picture of reality.
And yet many states are consistently red or blue. And these are terms used by both parties. There's nothing evil about it.
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
And yet many states are consistently red or blue. And these are terms used by both parties. There's nothing evil about it.
N9 they aren’t red or blue. There are usually a huge percentage of people in the state that support the other party, their political preferences shouldn’t be erased because they don’t have a majority that votes within that state. That’s what red and blue states does, it erases the huge percentage of people within a state who support the candidate that doesn’t win, their political thought matters in that state. The red and blue state nonsense obscures this reality.
 

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'
Trump and the Republicans lost the Senate!
1610050764732.png

Say Hi to the new Minority leader.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
N9 they aren’t red or blue. There are usually a huge percentage of people in the state that support the other party, their political preferences shouldn’t be erased because they don’t have a majority that votes within that state. That’s what red and blue states does, it erases the huge percentage of people within a state who support the candidate that doesn’t win, their political thought matters in that state. The red and blue state nonsense obscures this reality.
Massachusetts is 85% registered Democrats. In no way is it a purple state. It's just a way to refer to states. There's no hidden agenda to suppress voter rights.
 
Top