Go get them John Durham ! Make those arrests

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
The age for being liberal has been pushed WAY back. Thirty year old Americans are basing their opinions and beliefs on emotion the same way 20 yo did decades ago.
Young people have been brought up to be so soft that it's stunted their character growth and they haven't advanced in logic thinking. Things like facts and the truth are taking a back seat to emotional "thinking". I also believe social media has a lot to do with the retarded character development because it, and the inyernet, offer instant gratification. There is no doubt, or argument, that the instant gratification releases dopamine and it's addictive as an opiate. Just TRY taking someone's phone away.
 

Operational needs

Virescit Vulnere Virtus
Which pornographic material are you speaking of? When I was a kid we didn’t get porn in libraries. I doubt kids get it in libraries today either. Who wants to read porn when everyone has a cell phone?

Porn like this?
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
Isn’t it always the goal of the prosecution to “make an example” of the defendant? Whether Sussman or January 6 defendants or Michael Flynn or Martha Stewart, that’s the prosecution’s job.

Ok. When is it not?

When you're a BLM rioter.
Charges weren’t filed against any BLM rioters? I think you’re making things up. Again.

Changing the parameters of your objection is a non sequitur. Try again.
 

Fred's Myth

Nonhyphenated American
Years ago saw the Charleston, SC police chief say that for most criminals if they can get them to 35 they usually wise up and settle down and become productive citizens. So I think unless there's a financial incentive to remain so most extreme liberals will moderate their views a bit with age. But then again considering some of the idiocy they spout I may be overly optimistic.
Well, I bet @bbsam is over 35. Your assumption IS overly optimistic!
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
Why are you people so obsessed with forcing children to read pornography?
Which pornographic material are you speaking of?

Porn like this?
You never read Judy Blume? Did it make you a perverted psychosexual deviant?
So you gas lighted and tried to act like Democrats don't want kids to read porn.

Then when you're faced with the facts, your response is that you just don't care that Democrats want children to read porn.

Okay.
Carry on.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
So you gas lighted and tried to act like Democrats don't want kids to read porn.

Then when you're faced with the facts, your response is that you just don't care that Democrats want children to read porn.

Okay.
Carry on.
Same with everything for Democrats.

Remember Hunter Biden‘s laptop was Russian disinformation.

Now we know it’s not, and has national security implications they just say they don’t care.

Change the name from Hunter Biden to Donald Trump Jr. and there would’ve been a grand jury and 15 Senate investigations by now.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
If you read the article, you’d see that many were also tried and convicted.
Summer of a thousand violent riots.
You supported the violence.

Now you're pretending prosecutors wanted to "make an example" of the few that were arrested. You know that's not true.

Why do you play these petty games homie?
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
And everything was just fine.
You might want to open your eyes to the reality we live in today. Your attitude portends the slippery slope that we have already slid down. Confusion is rampant. Young minds cannot handle such images it doesn’t always display itself right away. There is a reason children and young people were protected from such thing. Do children and young people seem happier now? Welcome to the new hell.
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Same with everything for Democrats.

Remember Hunter Biden‘s laptop was Russian disinformation.

Now we know it’s not, and has national security implications they just say they don’t care.

Change the name from Hunter Biden to Donald Trump Jr. and there would’ve been a grand jury and 15 Senate investigations by now.
Democrats are pathological liars
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
I’d be willing to bet this goes nowhere. Showing Susmann as an entitled high roller will be easy. Proving him a criminal far more difficult.

You win. :)


"Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann was acquitted Tuesday of lying to the FBI, in the first trial of special counsel John Durham's investigation.

The verdict is a major defeat for Durham and his Justice Department prosecutors, who have spent three years looking for wrongdoing in the Trump-Russia probe. He claimed Sussmann lied during a 2016 meeting in which he passed a tip to the FBI about Donald Trump and Russia.

The Washington, DC, federal jury deliberated for six hours over two days before reaching its verdict."
 
Top