grievances

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
Is this her?
vera.jpg
vera.jpg
 
lol ......bubblehead, i must say u have found her/him, didnt know she was an internet superstar, lmao, oh and by the way how do i get involved in fantasy football with brown cafe i feel the need to take your crown, lmao,
 

JonFrum

Member
The Original Poster specifically asked about filing a grievance against another hourly worker. I told him, in post #5, that yes he could, as one option, and cited Article 37 which says, "Employees will also treat each other as well as the Employer with dignity and respect."

Yet three posters say you can not file a grievance against another hourly worker. Not just that it might be unwise, but that you can't do it, period. If any of the three, or anyone else for that matter, still believe this, could you tell me where you got this idea?
 

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
The Original Poster specifically asked about filing a grievance against another hourly worker. I told him, in post #5, that yes he could, as one option, and cited Article 37 which says, "Employees will also treat each other as well as the Employer with dignity and respect."

Yet three posters say you can not file a grievance against another hourly worker. Not just that it might be unwise, but that you can't do it, period. If any of the three, or anyone else for that matter, still believe this, could you tell me where you got this idea?

I wasn't one of the three to which you refer, but am in agreement with them.
Perhaps they are referencing the Teamster bylaw that states we will not bring reproach against another Teamster.
There is contractual language stating that we cannot be required by the company to do so as well.
To file a grievance against another Teamster brother or sister, would definitely qualify as bringing reproach in my mind.
 

whiskey

Well-Known Member
I'm afraid I'm "old school" on this one. Agreeing to meet off property one on one to settle a dispute doesn't have to have a physically violent end. More often than not, both parties resolve the issue in a civil manner. However, there is the slight chance for broken bones. Ouch!
 

Bubblehead

My Senior Picture
I'm afraid I'm "old school" on this one. Agreeing to meet off property one on one to settle a dispute doesn't have to have a physically violent end. More often than not, both parties resolve the issue in a civil manner. However, there is the slight chance for broken bones. Ouch!

"Old School", I guess, is not being above hitting a woman, no matter what her sexual orientation?:surprised:
 

JonFrum

Member
I wasn't one of the three to which you refer, but am in agreement with them.
Perhaps they are referencing the Teamster bylaw that states we will not bring reproach against another Teamster.
There is contractual language stating that we cannot be required by the company to do so as well.
To file a grievance against another Teamster brother or sister, would definitely qualify as bringing reproach in my mind.

Can you quote that contractual language????

The person bringing "reproach" against a fellow Teamster is the initiator, the person making the threats, not the person defending himself against the threats and possible future violent acts should the threats be carried out. An innocent person or victim always has the right to self defense. Nothing can take that away from you.

The Teamsters Constitution and local bylaws mention numerous charges that fellow members can be charged with, and spell out the methods for filing the charges, holding the trials, testifying against the accused, and punishing the guilty.

In recent years there has also been the IRB which accepts charges from Teamsters against other Teamsters and prosecutes them when the evidence warrants. All authorized by the IBT Constitution and paid for by the dues of the members.
 

Braveheart

Well-Known Member
How and should i file a grievance against another fellow sat air driver, who verbally threatened me with violence, meaning they said if they were off clock they would punch me in the face, the reason for this comment is because this person has more seniority then the rest of us and likes to do things their way even if its not right and is holding up 6 other drivers, so i spoke up and said something to them about this and also told them that person i didnt care for them and their one way attitude, all of us drivers do not like this person but i must be the one to get the ball rolling and hope the rest will back me, any answers will do.

Have a shop steward talk to the hothead. We take care of our own. Do not get management involved. He needs to be made aware of his actions and that they could get him fired. He needs to grow up and shut up. If it continues then get a steward to get a cool manager to sit the guy down with a steward to make sure he knows that one more and he is gone.

We had a guy of 19 years fired for losing his cool. He came back but no back pay and lost his house over it. Neither side was happy including the person who was threatened. We should always try to clean our own house before you call in the other side.
 

JonFrum

Member
You can file grievances against other Teamsters. I have seen it done and seen them won. Paid grievances.
Yes.

Sometimes a grievance is against Management, sometimes against a fellow worker, and sometimes against both. Seniority violations and threats of violence can sometimes be the result of a fellow worker's actions, with or without Management's knowledge.

And while we're on the subject, Management can file grievances too!!! It doesn't happen too often because normally they would just use their managerial authority to handle the matter, but it does happen.
 
Have a shop steward talk to the hothead. We take care of our own. Do not get management involved. He needs to be made aware of his actions and that they could get him fired. He needs to grow up and shut up. If it continues then get a steward to get a cool manager to sit the guy down with a steward to make sure he knows that one more and he is gone.

We had a guy of 19 years fired for losing his cool. He came back but no back pay and lost his house over it. Neither side was happy including the person who was threatened. We should always try to clean our own house before you call in the other side.
+1 this is good advice
 

UpstateNYUPSer(Ret)

Well-Known Member
Have a shop steward talk to the hothead. We take care of our own. Do not get management involved. He needs to be made aware of his actions and that they could get him fired. He needs to grow up and shut up. If it continues then get a steward to get a cool manager to sit the guy down with a steward to make sure he knows that one more and he is gone.

We had a guy of 19 years fired for losing his cool. He came back but no back pay and lost his house over it. Neither side was happy including the person who was threatened. We should always try to clean our own house before you call in the other side.

In this case the he is a she (sort of). Does this change your advice?
 

UPSSOCKS

Well-Known Member
I would fire both of them for being trouble makers. Well one's a trouble maker and the other is a tattle tell.... Either way, I would walk them both out......
 

UPSSOCKS

Well-Known Member
Have a shop steward talk to the hothead. We take care of our own. Do not get management involved. He needs to be made aware of his actions and that they could get him fired. He needs to grow up and shut up. If it continues then get a steward to get a cool manager to sit the guy down with a steward to make sure he knows that one more and he is gone.

We had a guy of 19 years fired for losing his cool. He came back but no back pay and lost his house over it. Neither side was happy including the person who was threatened. We should always try to clean our own house before you call in the other side.


WHAT???? Take care of our own... You mean we milk the dues out of our own and turn our backs to them.... It's every man/woman for themself as far as the teamsters are concerned...

And you are guest in managements house..........
 

JonFrum

Member
I would fire both of them for being trouble makers. Well one's a trouble maker and the other is a tattle tell.... Either way, I would walk them both out......
And that's because you despise UPS workers and will jump at the chance to ruin their lives. Guilty or innocent, it makes no difference. If the opportunity presents itself, you seize the moment you've been waiting for to display your contempt for these two UPSers. The rest of them will get theirs in due time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top