I don't believe that is right. In non "right to work" states, I believe the employees can be strong armed into pay a portion of dues, but Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 prohibits mandatory membership. So, if I get a work at the hub, payment of dues can be a condition of employment, but federal law prohibits union from requiring me from becoming a member, thus forced to abide by bylaws. I have the right to not become a member and union can't discipline or fine me for working during a strike or doing things they don't like.Now helpers there must join the union in order to work for UPS, and so must pay union dues. Even though it is a temporary job.
you also have "the right to find work elsewhere"if you dont want to play by the rules.we are not ready to change the rules for "right to work"trolls.I don't believe that is right. In non "right to work" states, I believe the employees can be strong armed into pay a portion of dues, but Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 prohibits mandatory membership. So, if I get a work at the hub, payment of dues can be a condition of employment, but federal law prohibits union from requiring me from becoming a member, thus forced to abide by bylaws. I have the right to not become a member and union can't discipline or fine me for working during a strike or doing things they don't like.
you also have "the right to find work elsewhere"if you dont want to play by the rules.we are not ready to change the rules for "right to work"trolls.
The upside , is it is a TAX WRITE OFF
I have every right to NOT want to play by the rules so long as I don't act on it. There are times I wish I can just ignore traffic lights because I just don't feel like waiting for it. I won't act on it nor do I expect the rules changed.you also have "the right to find work elsewhere"if you dont want to play by the rules.we are not ready to change the rules for "right to work"trolls.