Hilary Clinton

[moreluck]

 

[rod]

I made a $20 bet last night that Hillary will be our next President. I think its the first time in my life that I hope I lose a bet. If America was stupid enough to elect Barry for a second term I don't believe there is much hope for electing anyone but the old hag.

 

[MAKAVELI]

I made a $20 bet last night that Hillary will be our next President. I think its the first time in my life that I hope I lose a bet. If America was stupid enough to elect Barry for a second term I don't believe there is much hope for electing anyone but the old hag.

They were also stupid enough to elect GW twice.

 

[Babagounj]

I made a $20 bet last night that Hillary will be our next President. I think its the first time in my life that I hope I lose a bet. If America was stupid enough to elect Barry for a second term I don't believe there is much hope for electing anyone but the old hag.

With today's news about her foundation's re-filing of tax returns going back 5 yrs , the mining ore deal with Russia , and her breaking promises while SOS of accepting money from foreign gov'ts .
I think you will be able to call your bet off when she drops out of the race .

 

[oldngray]

With today's news about her foundation's re-filing of tax returns going back 5 yrs , the mining ore deal with Russia , and her breaking promises while SOS of accepting money from foreign gov'ts .
I think you will be able to call your bet off when she drops out of the race .

Major liberal newspapers are finally starting to report some of Hillary's dirty deeds. Other media are still pretty much behaving like her lapdogs though.

Oh My: NYT, Reuters Bombard Clintons With Foreign Cash, Tax Scandals

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/04/23/clintons-russian-money-uranium-n1989268

 

[moreluck]

I made a $20 bet last night that Hillary will be our next President. I think its the first time in my life that I hope I lose a bet. If America was stupid enough to elect Barry for a second term I don't believe there is much hope for electing anyone but the old hag.

Everyone is saying it's time for a woman president.......like Hillary is the only woman in America. I'd rather it be a male president. No picks yet.

 

[realbrown1]

They were also stupid enough to elect GW twice.

Blame the Democrats for those 2 elections.

 

[Babagounj]

 

[rod]

Blame the Democrats for those 2 elections.

won't get an argument out of me

 

[rod]

With today's news about her foundation's re-filing of tax returns going back 5 yrs , the mining ore deal with Russia , and her breaking promises while SOS of accepting money from foreign gov'ts .
I think you will be able to call your bet off when she drops out of the race .

Sadly none of this probably matters. All she has do is promise the entitlement crowd some free and she's in like flint. That and a certain % will vote for her "just because she's a women".

 

[bbsam]

Sadly none of this probably matters. All she has do is promise the entitlement crowd some free and she's in like flint. That and a certain % will vote for her "just because she's a women".

It's not the "entitlement crowd". People are just used to big money getting it's way. Big politicians, big bankers, they don't play by our rules...until they screw each other like Madoff.

 

[Jones]

People always go to the excuse about the "dumb electorate" when their candidate loses because it absolves them from facing the fact that their candidate was deeply flawed. The left cried about that when Bush won and the right has been crying about it since Obama won. It's a bs excuse. If Clinton wins (that's a big if) it won't be because the voters are dumb it will be because the republicans nominate a candidate who's even worse, which they are perfectly capable of doing.

 

[oldngray]

People always go to the excuse about the "dumb electorate" when their candidate loses because it absolves them from facing the fact that their candidate was deeply flawed. The left cried about that when Bush won and the right has been crying about it since Obama won. It's a bs excuse. If Clinton wins (that's a big if) it won't be because the voters are dumb it will be because the republicans nominate a candidate who's even worse, which they are perfectly capable of doing.

A lot of truth there. There is not one Republican candidate that stands out from the crowd. Of course the better candidates would be ones that liberals would consider worse but it is mostly RINO's who aren't much different from Democrats.

 

[rod]

It would sure be nice if any party had someone decent to run. They are all a bunch of 1%'ers who don't have a clue what is going on with the middle class. Our whole federal political system is loaded with trash

 

[Jones]

A lot of truth there. There is not one Republican candidate that stands out from the crowd. Of course the better candidates would be ones that liberals would consider worse but it is mostly RINO's who aren't much different from Democrats.

Some folks would say Clinton is a DINO who isn't much different from the Republicans. Clinton is pretty beatable and it won't surprise me if she loses (assuming she gets the nomination), but if the republicans nominate someone like Ted Cruz they won't be able to blame their loss on the electorate.

 

[MrFedEx]

Some folks would say Clinton is a DINO who isn't much different from the Republicans. Clinton is pretty beatable and it won't surprise me if she loses (assuming she gets the nomination), but if the republicans nominate someone like Ted Cruz they won't be able to blame their loss on the electorate.

I'm working a rural route right now. So far this week I've seen bumper stickers for Cruz, Ben Carson, and Rand Paul. Usually, big American pickups driven by old white men.

I say they nominate Carson, the Right Wing Obama. It would serve them right.

 

[Babagounj]

http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/02...ally-bans-hillarys-foreign-government-payola/

Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution actually bans foreign payola for U.S. officials.

Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as “other expenses.”

 

[realbrown1]

I'm working a rural route right now. So far this week I've seen bumper stickers for Cruz, Ben Carson, and Rand Paul. Usually, big American pickups driven by old white men.

I say they nominate Carson, the Right Wing Obama. It would serve them right.

I would be OK with that.

 

[realbrown1]

http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/02...ally-bans-hillarys-foreign-government-payola/

Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution actually bans foreign payola for U.S. officials.

Between 2009 and 2012, the Clinton Foundation raised over $500 million dollars according to a review of IRS documents by The Federalist (2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008). A measly 15 percent of that, or $75 million, went towards programmatic grants. More than $25 million went to fund travel expenses. Nearly $110 million went toward employee salaries and benefits. And a whopping $290 million during that period — nearly 60 percent of all money raised — was classified merely as “other expenses.”

Sounds like a SLUSH FUND.

 

[realbrown1]

Some folks would say Clinton is a DINO who isn't much different from the Republicans. Clinton is pretty beatable and it won't surprise me if she loses (assuming she gets the nomination), but if the republicans nominate someone like Ted Cruz they won't be able to blame their loss on the electorate.

The only Republicans that Hillary is similar to is RINOS.

And they are not REAL Republicans or Conservatives.