some might. some conservatives might tell it too.Marxists tell the truth?
some might. some conservatives might tell it too.Marxists tell the truth?
Yes.... I believe Rush to be more truthful than Chomsky.yea were talking about quality of truth telling not popularity
wages are higher in UK, better human rights, and UK has some kind of democracy with a king.Maybe you should be moving to China instead of the UK. Much more of the freedom you are looking for
did he have ads on his show?Yes.... I believe Rush to be more truthful than Chomsky.
i think in a sense it does.does that make them the truth makers? I don't trust your "common sense" nor do I believe it's the common sense that most people agree with
but China is more Marxist.wages are higher in UK, better human rights, and UK has some kind of democracy with a king.
and I do noti think in a sense it does.
i hope we see a revolution there and hereThey've got billionaires too. It's their wanting to influence and dominate much of the world, their willingness to use espionage to steal secrets, that has much of the world questioning continuing a relationship with them. They are finding out that their own people, who they treat like they own, are only willing to take so much. If they don't pay them but still demand work they get open rebellion. If they lay them off to where they.can't support themselves then the workers rebel. The Chinese military is big but the labor force is bigger. And elements within their military are likely sympathetic to the workers' plight. We may see a 1989 like revolution soon.
i think it might be foolishness in part but maybe not the way you describe itLife expectancy is only one measurement tool. Americans have the freedom to live their lives foolishly when it comes to life expectancy and it shows.
wages in China went up from almost nothing to a little more than nothingi hope we see a revolution there and here
wages have gone way up in china. america hasnt since 1973.
nato expanded probably because of america world control and probably because they sold weapons every time it expanded.Not one of them fixed their problems with Marxism. The two most successful of that group have allowed capitalism to flourish. China has had great success at the start but then the state started meddling. They are on the brink of collapse. Those are the four still existing. But what about all the previous communist countries? How many of them were known for their freedom? None. That's why they collapsed and are capitalist today. They may not be as capitalistic as the U.S., may have some socialist leanings, but they have rejected communism/Marxism and most have joined NATO to make sure it doesn't happen again. You're trying to convince people to try something they've already experienced and rejected.
head it was close to greece or portugal as i recall. it went up several hundred percentwages in China went up from almost nothing to a little more than nothing
irrelevant. Chomsky receives financial assistance through individuals, institutions, and even a little bit from Jeffrey Epstein at one time. They all get revenue from othersdid he have ads on his show?
super revelantirrelevant. Chomsky receives financial assistance through individuals, institutions, and even a little bit from Jeffrey Epstein at one time. They all get revenue from others
they probably would dominate but theyre in no position to dominate.And Vietnam, like China, has found success allowing capitalism to flourish. But they aren't seeking to dominate their neighbors like China. Because of their capitalism they are about to surpass Thailand as Southeast Asia's second largest economy.
nor have you ever heard of Chomsky not having financial help from outside sources. Never from Epstein toosuper revelant
ive never heard of a good political show with corporate ads.
by donation is preferable to corporate ads.nor have you ever heard of Chomsky not having financial help for outside sources
Why? Rush spoke for Rush. Businesses contributed because of who he was. He didn't change for themby donation is preferable to corporate ads.
rush never self censored?Why? Rush spoke for Rush. Businesses contributed because of who he was. He didn't change for them
Can you name a time when Rush self censored for his corporate sponsorships? I listened to him for a very long time. I didn’t always agree with him, but I always found his show very entertaining mostly because he was irreverent, to the liberal side and very often even to the side he said he was on. He was actually quite funny much of the time.rush never self censored?
quite often, these people who get put in these positions do so because they honestly believe what they say
i dont know if you noticed, but when you watch a show with big corporate ads, it usually doesnt have good journalism.