Israel

rickyb

Well-Known Member
They've got billionaires too. It's their wanting to influence and dominate much of the world, their willingness to use espionage to steal secrets, that has much of the world questioning continuing a relationship with them. They are finding out that their own people, who they treat like they own, are only willing to take so much. If they don't pay them but still demand work they get open rebellion. If they lay them off to where they.can't support themselves then the workers rebel. The Chinese military is big but the labor force is bigger. And elements within their military are likely sympathetic to the workers' plight. We may see a 1989 like revolution soon.
i hope we see a revolution there and here

wages have gone way up in china. america hasnt since 1973.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Not one of them fixed their problems with Marxism. The two most successful of that group have allowed capitalism to flourish. China has had great success at the start but then the state started meddling. They are on the brink of collapse. Those are the four still existing. But what about all the previous communist countries? How many of them were known for their freedom? None. That's why they collapsed and are capitalist today. They may not be as capitalistic as the U.S., may have some socialist leanings, but they have rejected communism/Marxism and most have joined NATO to make sure it doesn't happen again. You're trying to convince people to try something they've already experienced and rejected.
nato expanded probably because of america world control and probably because they sold weapons every time it expanded.

marxism encouraged protests which helped fix problems and give higher life expectancy than usa.

communism is not all collapsed. spain and italy have lots of worker run jobs. has some overlap with communism.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
And Vietnam, like China, has found success allowing capitalism to flourish. But they aren't seeking to dominate their neighbors like China. Because of their capitalism they are about to surpass Thailand as Southeast Asia's second largest economy.
they probably would dominate but theyre in no position to dominate.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Why? Rush spoke for Rush. Businesses contributed because of who he was. He didn't change for them
rush never self censored?
quite often, these people who get put in these positions do so because they honestly believe what they say

i dont know if you noticed, but when you watch a show with big corporate ads, it usually doesnt have good journalism.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
rush never self censored?
quite often, these people who get put in these positions do so because they honestly believe what they say

i dont know if you noticed, but when you watch a show with big corporate ads, it usually doesnt have good journalism.
Can you name a time when Rush self censored for his corporate sponsorships? I listened to him for a very long time. I didn’t always agree with him, but I always found his show very entertaining mostly because he was irreverent, to the liberal side and very often even to the side he said he was on. He was actually quite funny much of the time.
 
Top