Israel

BigUnionGuy

Got the T-Shirt
1749904798105.png
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
i was probably quoting lawrence wilkerson so in that case you would be wrong.

iran is not iraq. and its definitely not gaza.
And it definitely has had most of its air defenses knocked out by the Israelis. Iran has a lot of soldiers but they have to get to Israel before getting blown up. I know you support the destruction of Israel but it's not going to happen.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
And it definitely has had most of its air defenses knocked out by the Israelis. Iran has a lot of soldiers but they have to get to Israel before getting blown up. I know you support the destruction of Israel but it's not going to happen.
thats not what i heard. its a massive country. dont kid yourself.

israel is an extension of the us empire
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Eisenhower wasn't anything like Bernie Sanders and neither was the Republican Party. Sheesh that's stupid.
1749905645802.png

1749905688524.png


im happy to refresh your memory on american politics
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
israels nukes are a violation of international law. they do not agree to sign up to the non proliferation treaties.
In their defense on this issue, I wouldn’t sign it either. That treaty is just a crafted way for the countries that already have nuclear weapons to make sure other countries don’t get them and they have all the power. International law is a joke. A country’s sovereignty is the only thing they have. There’s no one coming to save you.

It’s about as silly as telling citizens to get rid of their guns because someone else will take care of them. Good luck with that.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
In their defense on this issue, I wouldn’t sign it either. That treaty is just a crafted way for the countries that already have nuclear weapons to make sure other countries don’t get them and they have all the power. International law is a joke. A country’s sovereignty is the only thing they have. There’s no one coming to save you.

It’s about as silly as telling citizens to get rid of their guns because someone else will take care of them. Good luck with that.
i think countries should live up to international law

and lawrence wilkerson is in favor of non proliferation treaties. so is chomsky

im not too familiar with this stuff i have to look it up.
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
i think countries should live up to international law

and lawrence wilkerson is in favor of non proliferation treaties. so is chomsky

im not too familiar with this stuff i have to look it up.
What you think, and what actually happens are two different things though. And you know that. Country's will not live up to international law that’s why international law is worthless. There is no penalty.

I didn’t say I like it. I just said you have to live reality..

Ask Ukraine, what happens when you give up your nuclear weapons and count on other people?

I’m in favor of no war and peace that doesn’t mean in the reality is we will not have wars, and there will be peace
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
In their defense on this issue, I wouldn’t sign it either. That treaty is just a crafted way for the countries that already have nuclear weapons to make sure other countries don’t get them and they have all the power. International law is a joke. A country’s sovereignty is the only thing they have. There’s no one coming to save you.

It’s about as silly as telling citizens to get rid of their guns because someone else will take care of them. Good luck with that.
the so called negotiations with iran would've meant losing its sovereignty so thats why it wasnt going to agree to it. plus they know what happened to libya when they gave up their nukes. im not sure iran had any and regardless that doesnt give a country a right to attack it.

i agree with you israel wouldve lost power in the area if htey gave up their nukes and i dont have a problem with that. theyre run by extremists
 

Thebrownblob

Well-Known Member
the so called negotiations with iran would've meant losing its sovereignty so thats why it wasnt going to agree to it. plus they know what happened to libya when they gave up their nukes. im not sure iran had any and regardless that doesnt give a country a right to attack it.

i agree with you israel wouldve lost power in the area if htey gave up their nukes and i dont have a problem with that. theyre run by extremists
Yep, I agree with that. And I also agree there’s no way Israel should give up their nuclear weapon. No one with any common sense is going to give up being able to protect themselves or having the upper hand.

Well, no one except the idiots in charge of Ukraine.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
What you think, and what actually happens are two different things though. And you know that. Country's will not live up to international law that’s why international law is worthless. There is no penalty.

I didn’t say I like it. I just said you have to live reality..

Ask Ukraine, what happens when you give up your nuclear weapons and count on other people?
well ukraine is a little different because they tried to join nato but it was illegal under international law for russia to invade. i agree if they had nukes they would not have been invaded.

i was quoting chomsky on the first one. he said it would be nice if usa followed international law.
 
Top