And Vietnam, like China, has found success allowing capitalism to flourish. But they aren't seeking to dominate their neighbors like China. Because of their capitalism they are about to surpass Thailand as Southeast Asia's second largest economy.This is the current leading countries of Marxism. What could be more freedom than these? lol
Currently, four countries self-identify as Marxist-Leninist states: China, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam. These countries are all one-party socialist republics, with their ruling parties explicitly identifying as Marxist-Leninist.
Elaboration:
China:
. The Chinese Communist Party frames its ideology as Marxism-Leninism adapted to China's historical context, often referred to as "socialism with Chinese characteristics".
The Communist Party of Cuba remains the sole ruling party and its ideology is rooted in Marxism-Leninism.
The Lao People's Revolutionary Party https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_communist_states is a one-party state that self-describes as Marxist-Leninist.
The Communist Party of Vietnam also identifies as Marxist-Leninist.
Historically, many other countries were also Marxist-Leninist states, such as the Soviet Union, the German Democratic Republic (GDR), Poland, and many others in Eastern Europe. However, these states largely collapsed or transitioned away from Marxist-Leninism during the Revolutions of 1989.
Israel
- Thread starter moreluck
- Start date
whats the top 10 most popular radio hosts of all time list
we can compare the names on the list and use our common sense and figure out which are better.\
i was quite impressed with the names on the 10 most cited list of all time.
Not one of them fixed their problems with Marxism. The two most successful of that group have allowed capitalism to flourish. China has had great success at the start but then the state started meddling. They are on the brink of collapse. Those are the four still existing. But what about all the previous communist countries? How many of them were known for their freedom? None. That's why they collapsed and are capitalist today. They may not be as capitalistic as the U.S., may have some socialist leanings, but they have rejected communism/Marxism and most have joined NATO to make sure it doesn't happen again. You're trying to convince people to try something they've already experienced and rejected.
tourists24
Well-Known Member
So because you're impressed with the list makes it the truth? Your list was based on popularity only and "common sense" is based on your opinion also. More people listened to Rush over Chomsky head to head
michael hudson said its because china did a state led mixed economy
i wasnt aware chomsky ever had a radio show
post top 10 most popular radio shows and lets compare the quality of the people on that list
tourists24
Well-Known Member
Life expectancy is only one measurement tool. Americans have the freedom to live their lives foolishly when it comes to life expectancy and it shows.
Which is on the brink of collapse because the communists couldn't just leave well enough alone.
oldngray
nowhere special
China opened up to capitalism in a limited way after their pure Marxism was failing but it didn't take long for them to revert to a more state controlled system.
he just says prolonged stagnation.
tourists24
Well-Known Member
Chomsky was a writer and access to the public the same as Limbaugh. So now you want to compare quality instead of popularity? If that's the case compare Chomsky to Limbaugh.....i wasnt aware chomsky ever had a radio show
post top 10 most popular radio shows and lets compare the quality of the people on that list
see @vantexan, oldngray gets it
tourists24
Well-Known Member
Maybe you should be moving to China instead of the UK. Much more of the freedom you are looking for
They've got billionaires too. It's their wanting to influence and dominate much of the world, their willingness to use espionage to steal secrets, that has much of the world questioning continuing a relationship with them. They are finding out that their own people, who they treat like they own, are only willing to take so much. If they don't pay them but still demand work they get open rebellion. If they lay them off to where they.can't support themselves then the workers rebel. The Chinese military is big but the labor force is bigger. And elements within their military are likely sympathetic to the workers' plight. We may see a 1989 like revolution soon.
People not eating leads to starvation and rebellion.
But you sure don't.
yea were talking about quality of truth telling not popularity
tourists24
Well-Known Member
does that make them the truth makers? I don't trust your "common sense" nor do I believe it's the common sense that most people agree with
Marxists tell the truth?
thats not what i said.
