You wouldn't have made it fifteen minutes on my block if you call that bullying.
Obviously not.
.
I did. The author had a clear bias and painted the bully as respectful. The bully was using language he knew the victim found offensive. I can smile when I call you a pedophile, doesn’t make it less offensive.
And yet the school said he wasn't involved in the same way as the other boys were. He just used the wrong pronouns. It was clear that his teacher had a bias and it's blatantly unfair to expect a child that age to understand what was going on with his classmate. And rest assured of this, you may think you're clever slipping in that pedophile bit, but you'd never say it to my face.
You underestimate 6th graders. The kid knew what he was doing using names the victim found offensive. Did you read the article? The author is so clearly biased you have to take his account with a grain of salt and apply some level of critical thinking to know what happened. Just because I can respectfully point to some evidence of your pedophilia doesn’t make it less offensive to you as you clearly demonstrated.
That's your take?
Enjoying yourself? Too bad you aren't here, we could both enjoy it.
She finds it easier to mm ake stuff up rather than actually read and investigate.
And you enjoy using the wrong pronouns to disparage people, much like the bully from the story.
You mean you are not a female?
If it PO'es you then I'm all for it!
You mean that your fantasy takes over where your logic should be, and you end up with an entirely different narrative.
Epstein took care of business himself!
