Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
You’ve argued against that fact several times and then you said they were stealing. I just was responding back that you have no problem with what you call “stealing” if it is in your benefit. It’s a little hypocritical don’t you think?I don't argue that deregulation played a large part in failed pension funds.
I was responding to a post that claimed deregulation was pro-union legislation.
Can't have it both ways.
A lot of very good brothers and sisters were about to lose everything. It’s really not something to make light of or pretend anyone is “stealing, “especially when the government had such a heavy hand at what happened to that fund. Those people did everything that was asked of them, and though a confluence of bad decision decisions by both the fund and more so the government in my opinion, they almost lost everything.
Many of those people were old enough they didn’t even have an option for a 401(k) because it wasn’t available to them yet, or for a long enough period That it would’ve made much difference.
Last edited: